Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
AAO walks through wages paid, net income, and net current assets year by year and finds each insufficient, and rejects the Sonegawa totality argument given the Petitioner's dissolution and lack of growth or reputation evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO walks through wages paid, net income, and net current assets year by year and finds each insufficient, and rejects the Sonegawa totality argument given the Petitioner's dissolution and lack of growth or reputation evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-22_01_B5203; source_row=29639 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO affirmed its prior finding that the Petitioner's publications, citation record, and recommendation letters did not adequately demonstrate he has served as an impetus for progress in the aerospace/aerodynamics field or generated substantial positive discourse sufficient to show he is well-positioned to advance CFD research.…
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed its prior finding that the Petitioner's publications, citation record, and recommendation letters did not adequately demonstrate he has served as an impetus for progress in the aerospace/aerodynamics field or generated substantial positive discourse sufficient to show he is well-positioned to advance CFD research. The new letter from Y- lacked corroborating documentation and did not describe practical current application of the Petitioner's methodology.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-21_02_B5203; source_row=29636 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Director's prong-1 analysis was misdirected — it addressed astrophysics/physics rather than pediatric dentistry — and therefore did not actually address whether the Petitioner's proposed endeavor in pediatric dentistry has substantial merit and national importance. AAO withdrew the decision and remanded for a proper analysis.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's prong-1 analysis was misdirected — it addressed astrophysics/physics rather than pediatric dentistry — and therefore did not actually address whether the Petitioner's proposed endeavor in pediatric dentistry has substantial merit and national importance. AAO withdrew the decision and remanded for a proper analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-21_01_B5203; source_row=29632 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mechanical / Manufacturing EngineeringEngineer
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer and labor certification requirements
What the decision said
AAO again explicitly reserved its opinion on the third Dhanasar prong because the second prong was dispositive and it was unnecessary to reach this issue.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO again explicitly reserved its opinion on the third Dhanasar prong because the second prong was dispositive and it was unnecessary to reach this issue.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-21_02_B5203; source_row=29637 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that several articles were about the Petitioner's projects rather than the Petitioner himself and did not include substantial discussion of his work; articles that were about him lacked proof that they appeared in professional or major publications because circulation figures were unattributed and raw numbers alone do not establish high readership compared to other publications; and reliance on publishers' self-pr…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that several articles were about the Petitioner's projects rather than the Petitioner himself and did not include substantial discussion of his work; articles that were about him lacked proof that they appeared in professional or major publications because circulation figures were unattributed and raw numbers alone do not establish high readership compared to other publications; and reliance on publishers' self-promotional statements was insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-20_01_B2203; source_row=29624 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c