Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 10041–10050

EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner's evidence showed he performed supporting tasks as a contractor rather than work integral to his clients' own operations. His argument that any SAP Basis administrator is inherently critical does not establish that his specific work was of significant importance to the outcome of a given organization's activities.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's evidence showed he performed supporting tasks as a contractor rather than work integral to his clients' own operations. His argument that any SAP Basis administrator is inherently critical does not establish that his specific work was of significant importance to the outcome of a given organization's activities.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-11_01_B2203; source_row=29612
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

What the decision said

The Petitioner did not address this criterion on appeal and it is considered abandoned.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not address this criterion on appeal and it is considered abandoned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-11_01_B2203; source_row=29608
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · High remuneration

high remuneration for services

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO did not disturb the Director's conclusion that the Petitioner satisfied the high remuneration criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not disturb the Director's conclusion that the Petitioner satisfied the high remuneration criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-11_01_B2203; source_row=29613
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

Labor certification education requirement meets advanced degree standard

Why AAO was not persuaded

The H.14 language stating 'Bachelor's equivalency may be met by a combination of degrees' allows for a minimum education requirement that falls below a single U.S. baccalaureate or foreign equivalent degree. The regulation requires 'a' bachelor's degree (singular), and combinations of credentials cannot satisfy this requirement in the EB-2 advanced degree context.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The H.14 language stating 'Bachelor's equivalency may be met by a combination of degrees' allows for a minimum education requirement that falls below a single U.S. baccalaureate or foreign equivalent degree. The regulation requires 'a' bachelor's degree (singular), and combinations of credentials cannot satisfy this requirement in the EB-2 advanced degree context.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-08_01_B5203; source_row=29606
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established

Case facts

Social Sciences48 papers

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner showed that she operates a weight loss center but did not establish the major significance of her contributions. Copyright registration indicates originality but not major significance. Her company was one of several that tested equipment and she did not show participation in its design.…

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner showed that she operates a weight loss center but did not establish the major significance of her contributions. Copyright registration indicates originality but not major significance. Her company was one of several that tested equipment and she did not show participation in its design. Articles are covered by a separate criterion and mere documentation of their existence does not establish major significance without evidence of field-wide impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-07_01_B2203; source_row=29603
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot established

Case facts

Social Sciences48 papers

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

The 2006 award was from a municipal authority with no evidence of wider recognition. The conflict management citation was from an EU-funded organization, but that did not make it a nationally/internationally recognized prize from the EU. The 2007 certificate's printed text showed it documented participation in a five-hour training workshop, not a competition award.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The 2006 award was from a municipal authority with no evidence of wider recognition. The conflict management citation was from an EU-funded organization, but that did not make it a nationally/internationally recognized prize from the EU. The 2007 certificate's printed text showed it documented participation in a five-hour training workshop, not a competition award. None of the awards were shown to relate to the Petitioner's current field of weight loss clinic management.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-07_01_B2203; source_row=29601
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot established

Case facts

Social Sciences48 papers

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAPB membership letter did not clearly establish outstanding achievements as a condition of membership, and the AAAAE letter described the Petitioner's active participation in the organization's development rather than any outstanding-achievement requirement. The burden of proof lies with the Petitioner, not with USCIS to rebut.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAPB membership letter did not clearly establish outstanding achievements as a condition of membership, and the AAAAE letter described the Petitioner's active participation in the organization's development rather than any outstanding-achievement requirement. The burden of proof lies with the Petitioner, not with USCIS to rebut.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-07_01_B2203; source_row=29602
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences48 papers

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

What the decision said

AAO explicitly declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the step-1 threshold, though it noted in dicta the record did not support a finding of extraordinary ability.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the step-1 threshold, though it noted in dicta the record did not support a finding of extraordinary ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-07_01_B2203; source_row=29605
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that the Petitioner's new evidence was either post-filing and thus impermissible, or not genuinely new. Even if considered, the evidence showed that the Petitioner's services and the associated technology were available only to paying clients, not to the public or science at large, and therefore did not establish national importance. AAO also rejected the request to apply an NSF standard instead of Dhanasar.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's new evidence was either post-filing and thus impermissible, or not genuinely new. Even if considered, the evidence showed that the Petitioner's services and the associated technology were available only to paying clients, not to the public or science at large, and therefore did not establish national importance. AAO also rejected the request to apply an NSF standard instead of Dhanasar.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-05_01_B5203; source_row=29598
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

AAO noted that the gene therapy project evidence pertains to prong two (well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor) rather than prong one (national importance), but did not reach a merits finding on prong two as the motion was not directed to that issue.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO noted that the gene therapy project evidence pertains to prong two (well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor) rather than prong one (national importance), but did not reach a merits finding on prong two as the motion was not directed to that issue.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-05_01_B5203; source_row=29599
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment