Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 10051–10060
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to waive job offer requirement
What the decision said
The motion did not address prong three and AAO did not reach it.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The motion did not address prong three and AAO did not reach it.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-05_01_B5203; source_row=29600 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
The bank records were insufficient because there was no corroborating evidence of the transactions (no invoices, receipts, or tax documentation) and no comparative evidence establishing that the amounts constituted high remuneration relative to other painters in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The bank records were insufficient because there was no corroborating evidence of the transactions (no invoices, receipts, or tax documentation) and no comparative evidence establishing that the amounts constituted high remuneration relative to other painters in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-30_01_B2203; source_row=29592 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
Although the Petitioner demonstrated receipt of the awards, the record lacked sufficient evidence regarding the prestigious nature of the exhibitions and contests or the national/international recognition associated with the awards. Unsupported assertions by the petitioner are insufficient to carry the burden of proof.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Although the Petitioner demonstrated receipt of the awards, the record lacked sufficient evidence regarding the prestigious nature of the exhibitions and contests or the national/international recognition associated with the awards. Unsupported assertions by the petitioner are insufficient to carry the burden of proof.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-30_01_B2203; source_row=29589 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The two employment certificates confirmed only that the Petitioner was invited to participate as a judge; the record lacked evidence confirming she accepted the invitation and actually participated, or documenting the nature of her judging activities.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The two employment certificates confirmed only that the Petitioner was invited to participate as a judge; the record lacked evidence confirming she accepted the invitation and actually participated, or documenting the nature of her judging activities.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-30_01_B2203; source_row=29591 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record lacked documentary evidence of the Petitioner's actual membership in the two associations she claimed had outstanding-achievement requirements. Additionally, evidence submitted for the first time on appeal was not accepted because the Petitioner had been put on notice of the deficiency and had an opportunity to respond. The only documented membership was in an association whose requirements were not established.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record lacked documentary evidence of the Petitioner's actual membership in the two associations she claimed had outstanding-achievement requirements. Additionally, evidence submitted for the first time on appeal was not accepted because the Petitioner had been put on notice of the deficiency and had an opportunity to respond. The only documented membership was in an association whose requirements were not established.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-30_01_B2203; source_row=29590 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the initial evidence requirement of at least three criteria.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the initial evidence requirement of at least three criteria.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-30_01_B2203; source_row=29593 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO affirmed the misrepresentation finding, concluding that the Petitioner's agency-blame explanation was untimely and not credible, that her signed petition created a strong presumption of knowledge of its contents, and that the new evidence created further inconsistencies rather than resolving them.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed the misrepresentation finding, concluding that the Petitioner's agency-blame explanation was untimely and not credible, that her signed petition created a strong presumption of knowledge of its contents, and that the new evidence created further inconsistencies rather than resolving them.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-30_01_B5203; source_row=29594 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
Substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner materially changed her proposed endeavor between filing and appeal, that the initial description lacked the specificity required under Dhanasar, and that on motion she failed to present new facts to cure this deficiency.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner materially changed her proposed endeavor between filing and appeal, that the initial description lacked the specificity required under Dhanasar, and that on motion she failed to present new facts to cure this deficiency.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-30_01_B5203; source_row=29595 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c