Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 10071–10080
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot established
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Membership
memberships
Why AAO was not persuaded
YPO's membership criteria are primarily quantitative (job title, number of employees, company financials, age) verified by third-party auditors, not by recognized experts in the field. Final decisions are made by local chapter executive committees whose qualifications as recognized national or international experts are not established, and the qualitative factors considered are undefined.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
YPO's membership criteria are primarily quantitative (job title, number of employees, company financials, age) verified by third-party auditors, not by recognized experts in the field. Final decisions are made by local chapter executive committees whose qualifications as recognized national or international experts are not established, and the qualitative factors considered are undefined.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-17_01_B2203; source_row=29566 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Membership in professional associations (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(E))
What the decision said
AAO flagged that the submission of a membership card alone, without supporting evidence such as membership requirements, may be insufficient to establish that the organization is a professional association. The Director is instructed to assess this on remand.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO flagged that the submission of a membership card alone, without supporting evidence such as membership requirements, may be insufficient to establish that the organization is a professional association. The Director is instructed to assess this on remand.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-17_01_B5203; source_row=29573 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Ten years of full-time experience (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(B))
What the decision said
AAO identified inconsistencies between the class schedule (showing limited hours) and the revised employer letter (claiming 40 hours per week), and instructed the Director to resolve these on remand and determine whether the petitioner has established ten years of full-time experience as a ballet instructor.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO identified inconsistencies between the class schedule (showing limited hours) and the revised employer letter (claiming 40 hours per week), and instructed the Director to resolve these on remand and determine whether the petitioner has established ten years of full-time experience as a ballet instructor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-17_01_B5203; source_row=29572 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the step-1 threshold of three criteria, but noted in dictum that the aggregate record does not support the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the step-1 threshold of three criteria, but noted in dictum that the aggregate record does not support the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-17_01_B2203; source_row=29571 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organization
Why the evidence was persuasive
The AAO found the Director applied the wrong legal standard by requiring industry-wide impact, which is not required for criterion viii. The Petitioner's job title and duties established a leading role, and the submitted media reports and industry awards established the organization's distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found the Director applied the wrong legal standard by requiring industry-wide impact, which is not required for criterion viii. The Petitioner's job title and duties established a leading role, and the submitted media reports and industry awards established the organization's distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-17_01_B2203; source_row=29569 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
While the record supported substantial merit given the importance of U.S.-Brazil trade, AAO found the Petitioner failed to show that her specific proposed endeavor had national importance. Her work would not extend beyond her employer and clientele to impact the field broadly, and she did not demonstrate significant potential to employ U.S. workers or produce substantial positive economic effects nationally.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
While the record supported substantial merit given the importance of U.S.-Brazil trade, AAO found the Petitioner failed to show that her specific proposed endeavor had national importance. Her work would not extend beyond her employer and clientele to impact the field broadly, and she did not demonstrate significant potential to employ U.S. workers or produce substantial positive economic effects nationally.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-16_03_B5203; source_row=29559 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the credential evaluation of little value without an official transcript, noted the diploma contained ambiguous dual graduation dates, and concluded the Director must address whether the Petitioner holds a qualifying advanced degree or five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience at the time of filing.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the credential evaluation of little value without an official transcript, noted the diploma contained ambiguous dual graduation dates, and concluded the Director must address whether the Petitioner holds a qualifying advanced degree or five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience at the time of filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-16_02_B5203; source_row=29555 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c