Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 10111–10120

NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social SciencesProfessor

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement

What the decision said

AAO expressly reserved this prong because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first Dhanasar prong, making analysis of the third prong unnecessary.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO expressly reserved this prong because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first Dhanasar prong, making analysis of the third prong unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-13_01_B5203; source_row=29515
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social SciencesProfessor

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

AAO expressly reserved this prong because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first Dhanasar prong, making analysis of the second prong unnecessary.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO expressly reserved this prong because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first Dhanasar prong, making analysis of the second prong unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-13_01_B5203; source_row=29514
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role

Why the evidence was persuasive

The Director found this criterion satisfied and AAO did not re-examine it on appeal.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Director found this criterion satisfied and AAO did not re-examine it on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-13_04_B2203; source_row=29533
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging

Why the evidence was persuasive

The Director found this criterion satisfied and the Petitioner did not dispute it on appeal. AAO did not re-examine it.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
The Director found this criterion satisfied and the Petitioner did not dispute it on appeal. AAO did not re-examine it.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-13_04_B2203; source_row=29530
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Artistic displayNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Artistic display

display at artistic exhibitions or showcases

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner raised this criterion for the first time on appeal. Because the Petitioner did not assert eligibility at the initial filing or in response to the RFE, AAO declined to consider new eligibility claims or evidence submitted on appeal.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner raised this criterion for the first time on appeal. Because the Petitioner did not assert eligibility at the initial filing or in response to the RFE, AAO declined to consider new eligibility claims or evidence submitted on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-13_04_B2203; source_row=29532
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · High remuneration

high remuneration for services

What the decision said

The Petitioner did not contest the Director's conclusion on remuneration on appeal, so AAO considered the issue abandoned.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not contest the Director's conclusion on remuneration on appeal, so AAO considered the issue abandoned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-13_03_B2203; source_row=29528
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

Why the evidence was persuasive

On motion, newly submitted evidence about the Petitioner's membership on a national team led AAO to conclude this constitutes a qualifying membership, consistent with USCIS Policy Manual guidance that national all-star or Olympic team selection may serve as comparable evidence.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
On motion, newly submitted evidence about the Petitioner's membership on a national team led AAO to conclude this constitutes a qualifying membership, consistent with USCIS Policy Manual guidance that national all-star or Olympic team selection may serve as comparable evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-13_02_B2203; source_row=29517
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

Why the evidence was persuasive

The Director had granted this criterion, and it was not disturbed on appeal or motion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Director had granted this criterion, and it was not disturbed on appeal or motion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-13_02_B2203; source_row=29516
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · High remuneration

high remuneration for services

What the decision said

AAO declined to reach this criterion formally because three criteria were already satisfied, though AAO's discussion of salary evidence in the coaching context indicated the evidence was unpersuasive.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach this criterion formally because three criteria were already satisfied, though AAO's discussion of salary evidence in the coaching context indicated the evidence was unpersuasive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-13_02_B2203; source_row=29521
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material about the individual in professional or major trade publications or major media

Why the evidence was persuasive

New evidence on motion showed www.sport.ua is ranked #10 among sports websites in the relevant country, satisfying the major media requirement for the published-material criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
New evidence on motion showed www.sport.ua is ranked #10 among sports websites in the relevant country, satisfying the major media requirement for the published-material criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-13_02_B2203; source_row=29518
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment