Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 10131–10140
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical roles for organizations with distinguished reputations
What the decision said
AAO found the Director's analysis was conclusory—specifically not referencing any evidence submitted to establish the reputation of employing organizations—and remanded for an analysis with adequate explanation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's analysis was conclusory—specifically not referencing any evidence submitted to establish the reputation of employing organizations—and remanded for an analysis with adequate explanation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-09_01_B2203; source_row=29488 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
What the decision said
AAO noted the Director failed to consider this criterion at all despite evidence in the record, and remanded for the Director to evaluate the evidence on this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted the Director failed to consider this criterion at all despite evidence in the record, and remanded for the Director to evaluate the evidence on this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-09_01_B2203; source_row=29482 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why the evidence was persuasive
The AAO agreed that the screening of the Petitioner's films at independent film festivals satisfies the criterion requiring evidence of display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed that the screening of the Petitioner's films at independent film festivals satisfies the criterion requiring evidence of display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-09_02_B2203; source_row=29501 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
Substantial merit and national importance
What the decision said
AAO withdrew the Director's finding, noting the Director failed to adequately analyze the Professional Plan & Statement or other evidence. AAO noted that while instructional work and salon services have substantial merit, the record does not establish broader national importance for those activities; but remanded for the Director to analyze the research component and other evidence fully.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding, noting the Director failed to adequately analyze the Professional Plan & Statement or other evidence. AAO noted that while instructional work and salon services have substantial merit, the record does not establish broader national importance for those activities; but remanded for the Director to analyze the research component and other evidence fully.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-09_01_B5203; source_row=29495 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
Well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because it did not adequately explain the basis for finding prong two met and did not consider all the evidence submitted. AAO remanded for a full analysis.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because it did not adequately explain the basis for finding prong two met and did not consider all the evidence submitted. AAO remanded for a full analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-09_01_B5203; source_row=29496 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Official academic record (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A))
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the Petitioner's graduation certificates and school records from Brazil sufficient to meet this criterion, contrary to the Director's determination.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's graduation certificates and school records from Brazil sufficient to meet this criterion, contrary to the Director's determination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-09_01_B5203; source_row=29491 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
On balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer requirement
What the decision said
AAO found the Director failed to address all submitted evidence and arguments under prong three, and remanded for a full analysis that considers each piece of evidence and balancing factor.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director failed to address all submitted evidence and arguments under prong three, and remanded for a full analysis that considers each piece of evidence and balancing factor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-09_01_B5203; source_row=29497 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c