Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 10141–10150
EB-1Aprocedural or otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
procedural or other
Timeliness of prior motion / proper cause for reopening or reconsideration
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner misread the USCIS flexibility notice: it extended the filing period for Form I-290B to a total of 60 days (a 30-day extension) from the decision date, not 60 days after a response due date. The first motion filed 77 days after the AAO decision was untimely, and the second motion showed no error of fact or law in that determination.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner misread the USCIS flexibility notice: it extended the filing period for Form I-290B to a total of 60 days (a 30-day extension) from the decision date, not 60 days after a response due date. The first motion filed 77 days after the AAO decision was untimely, and the second motion showed no error of fact or law in that determination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-08_01_B2203; source_row=29480 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
Final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO rejected the argument that performing in New York City inherently confers national or international acclaim, and found that evidence of other famous actors winning the same award did not establish the Petitioner achieved comparable fame through that award. Media coverage consisted only of local television appearances with no indication of national or international reach.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO rejected the argument that performing in New York City inherently confers national or international acclaim, and found that evidence of other famous actors winning the same award did not establish the Petitioner achieved comparable fame through that award. Media coverage consisted only of local television appearances with no indication of national or international reach.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-08_01_B2203; source_row=29481 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Because the DPT is customarily required for physical therapists, the bachelor's-plus-experience equivalency is unavailable, and the record does not show the Petitioner holds a DPT or foreign equivalent. AAO reaches the same outcome as the Director but on the doctoral-degree-required ground rather than the experience-letter ground.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Because the DPT is customarily required for physical therapists, the bachelor's-plus-experience equivalency is unavailable, and the record does not show the Petitioner holds a DPT or foreign equivalent. AAO reaches the same outcome as the Director but on the doctoral-degree-required ground rather than the experience-letter ground.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-07_01_B5203; source_row=29471 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
What the decision said
AAO does not reach prong 1 because EB-2 eligibility is unmet, but flags that the RFE-stage endeavor description constituted an impermissible material change from the originally proposed endeavor of being a physical therapist.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO does not reach prong 1 because EB-2 eligibility is unmet, but flags that the RFE-stage endeavor description constituted an impermissible material change from the originally proposed endeavor of being a physical therapist.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-07_01_B5203; source_row=29473 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary's five years of qualifying experience in the job offered
Why AAO was not persuaded
While the NOIR's allegations based on failed verification attempts were inadequate to support revocation (given the passage of time and insufficient detail about verification methods), the employer letter and co-worker letter for the Indian employment both lack any description of the Beneficiary's actual duties or experience, failing to satisfy 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1).…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
While the NOIR's allegations based on failed verification attempts were inadequate to support revocation (given the passage of time and insufficient detail about verification methods), the employer letter and co-worker letter for the Indian employment both lack any description of the Beneficiary's actual duties or experience, failing to satisfy 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1). This independently defeats proof of the required five years of experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-03_01_B5203; source_row=29469 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Ability to pay combined proffered wages of all applicable petitions
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record omitted proffered wages for at least five other petitions, lacked evidence of beneficiaries' purported portings, and contained unreliable financial documents due to discrepancies with California authority records. USCIS cannot evaluate realistic wage obligations without complete data, and the portability provision does not protect a petition that was never validly approved.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record omitted proffered wages for at least five other petitions, lacked evidence of beneficiaries' purported portings, and contained unreliable financial documents due to discrepancies with California authority records. USCIS cannot evaluate realistic wage obligations without complete data, and the portability provision does not protect a petition that was never validly approved.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-03_01_B5203; source_row=29468 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Petitioner's bona fide intent to employ beneficiary in offered position
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that the Beneficiary's residence outside California does not establish lack of intent, as beneficiaries need not work in offered positions before obtaining permanent residence, and California payroll records confirm the company employed workers in-state.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that the Beneficiary's residence outside California does not establish lack of intent, as beneficiaries need not work in offered positions before obtaining permanent residence, and California payroll records confirm the company employed workers in-state.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-03_01_B5203; source_row=29470 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c