Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 10151–10160
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
What the decision said
AAO criticized the Director for failing to analyze this claimed criterion and remanded.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO criticized the Director for failing to analyze this claimed criterion and remanded.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-02_02_B2203; source_row=29467 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
What the decision said
AAO found the Director failed to analyze evidence under this criterion despite the Petitioner having claimed it, and remanded for the Director's consideration.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director failed to analyze evidence under this criterion despite the Petitioner having claimed it, and remanded for the Director's consideration.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-02_02_B2203; source_row=29465 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized awards
What the decision said
AAO did not disturb the Director's favorable finding but directed clarification on remand because the Director's analysis cited the wrong criterion and lacked a complete analysis.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not disturb the Director's favorable finding but directed clarification on remand because the Director's analysis cited the wrong criterion and lacked a complete analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-02_02_B2203; source_row=29463 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the petitioner
What the decision said
AAO criticized the Director for citing no authority for requiring a CV from authors of letters from publication officials, noting the letters were signed, dated, on official letterhead, and certified-translated. AAO directed the Director to reconsider on remand without itself making a final determination.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO criticized the Director for citing no authority for requiring a CV from authors of letters from publication officials, noting the letters were signed, dated, on official letterhead, and certified-translated. AAO directed the Director to reconsider on remand without itself making a final determination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-02_02_B2203; source_row=29464 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that while the Petitioner is an experienced registered nurse providing valuable benefit to her employer and patients, the record does not show her proposed endeavor would impact U.S. healthcare or nursing more broadly. The nursing shortage argument fails because such shortages are directly addressed through the labor certification process and Schedule A designation.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the Petitioner is an experienced registered nurse providing valuable benefit to her employer and patients, the record does not show her proposed endeavor would impact U.S. healthcare or nursing more broadly. The nursing shortage argument fails because such shortages are directly addressed through the labor certification process and Schedule A designation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-01_01_B5203; source_row=29460 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in major media
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO did not disturb the Director's determination that this criterion was satisfied, though AAO noted that many articles lacked sufficient independent evidence to establish the publications as major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not disturb the Director's determination that this criterion was satisfied, though AAO noted that many articles lacked sufficient independent evidence to establish the publications as major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-01_01_B2203; source_row=29457 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's awards were mostly received many years before filing, her media coverage did not set her apart from others in the field, her commercial success lacked evidence of personal recognition, and her single judging instance did not reflect a career of acclaimed work. Taken together, the record does not establish sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the very top of her field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's awards were mostly received many years before filing, her media coverage did not set her apart from others in the field, her commercial success lacked evidence of personal recognition, and her single judging instance did not reflect a career of acclaimed work. Taken together, the record does not establish sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the very top of her field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-01_01_B2203; source_row=29459 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the limited media coverage of the awards insufficient to establish national or international recognition, noting inconsistencies in information about the award organization, lack of media coverage of the specific ceremonies where the Petitioner received his awards, and unclear selection criteria.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the limited media coverage of the awards insufficient to establish national or international recognition, noting inconsistencies in information about the award organization, lack of media coverage of the specific ceremonies where the Petitioner received his awards, and unclear selection criteria.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-05-31_01_B2203; source_row=29440 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
Published material about the individual in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner failed to establish that print publications are major media (no circulation data or rankings provided), and that screenshots and producer summaries of television appearances do not satisfy the requirement for published material with transcripts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner failed to establish that print publications are major media (no circulation data or rankings provided), and that screenshots and producer summaries of television appearances do not satisfy the requirement for published material with transcripts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-05-31_01_B2203; source_row=29441 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c