Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 10301–10310
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to reach the third prong because failure on the first prong was dispositive and addressing the third prong could not change the outcome.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the third prong because failure on the first prong was dispositive and addressing the third prong could not change the outcome.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-03-17_03_B5203; source_row=29256 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Petitioner willfully misrepresented his employment with O-P- (a family business he supposedly led at age 19), his patented technologies (one patent belonged to another person; another was for an unrelated electric lamp), and the nature of D-S- (described as communications vs. freight transportation).…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner willfully misrepresented his employment with O-P- (a family business he supposedly led at age 19), his patented technologies (one patent belonged to another person; another was for an unrelated electric lamp), and the nature of D-S- (described as communications vs. freight transportation). The misrepresentations were material because they purported to establish exceptional ability and that he was well positioned to advance the endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-03-17_05_B5203; source_row=29257 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO concluded the Petitioner failed to substantiate his claimed CEO and director roles, his managerial experience, and his patented technologies, and the supporting employer letters did not comport with 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the Petitioner failed to substantiate his claimed CEO and director roles, his managerial experience, and his patented technologies, and the supporting employer letters did not comport with 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-03-17_05_B5203; source_row=29258 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer and labor certification
What the decision said
AAO did not reach the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish national importance under the first prong, making the motion dismissal dispositive on that basis.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not reach the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish national importance under the first prong, making the motion dismissal dispositive on that basis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-03-17_01_B5203; source_row=29249 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO noted that evidence of expertise, record of success, prior work product, and salary are considerations under the second prong, but did not separately re-evaluate the second prong because the motion focused on the first prong deficiency.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted that evidence of expertise, record of success, prior work product, and salary are considerations under the second prong, but did not separately re-evaluate the second prong because the motion focused on the first prong deficiency.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-03-17_01_B5203; source_row=29248 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The evidence made broad claims without probative details about whom, what, and when the Petitioner judged. Letters stated he was invited to serve or was part of a voting body but did not sufficiently describe his actual judging participation. The voting-at-membership-meetings argument was raised for the first time on appeal and was in any event unsupported by evidence of actual voting.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The evidence made broad claims without probative details about whom, what, and when the Petitioner judged. Letters stated he was invited to serve or was part of a voting body but did not sufficiently describe his actual judging participation. The voting-at-membership-meetings argument was raised for the first time on appeal and was in any event unsupported by evidence of actual voting.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-03-16_01_B2203; source_row=29241 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
While the Petitioner submitted qualifying articles with required title, date, and author, he failed to demonstrate that the websites constitute professional or major trade publications or other major media. Readership data was for print editions rather than the websites, self-serving website statistics were insufficient, and the significance of web traffic figures was not established.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
While the Petitioner submitted qualifying articles with required title, date, and author, he failed to demonstrate that the websites constitute professional or major trade publications or other major media. Readership data was for print editions rather than the websites, self-serving website statistics were insufficient, and the significance of web traffic figures was not established.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-03-16_01_B2203; source_row=29240 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c