Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
What the decision said
AAO declined to evaluate this criterion due to the Director's failure to analyze the evidence, and remanded for the Director to focus analysis on the two awards claimed in the RFE response.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to evaluate this criterion due to the Director's failure to analyze the evidence, and remanded for the Director to focus analysis on the two awards claimed in the RFE response.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-03-15_02_B2203; source_row=29230 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance in the field
What the decision said
AAO noted that the Director's discussion in the 'Conclusion' section appeared to relate to this criterion but was inadequate because it did not address specific evidence; AAO remanded for a proper analysis.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted that the Director's discussion in the 'Conclusion' section appeared to relate to this criterion but was inadequate because it did not address specific evidence; AAO remanded for a proper analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-03-15_02_B2203; source_row=29233 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
substantial prospective benefit to the United States
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the Director's analysis flawed because it sought evidence already provided and ignored a relevant reference letter. Because the term 'substantially benefit' is interpreted broadly and the Petitioner provided a detailed plan and supporting evidence, AAO found this requirement met.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's analysis flawed because it sought evidence already provided and ignored a relevant reference letter. Because the term 'substantially benefit' is interpreted broadly and the Petitioner provided a detailed plan and supporting evidence, AAO found this requirement met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-03-15_02_B2203; source_row=29237 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
What the decision said
AAO does not reach prong one because the threshold EB-2 issue and the question of what the proposed endeavor actually is must first be resolved on remand.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO does not reach prong one because the threshold EB-2 issue and the question of what the proposed endeavor actually is must first be resolved on remand.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-03-14_01_B5203; source_row=29220 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO withdrew the Director's threshold finding, identifying inconsistencies the Petitioner must resolve: the three-year length of the Licenciado program conflicts with EDGE's equivalency, and the evaluator failed to review employment letters as required.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's threshold finding, identifying inconsistencies the Petitioner must resolve: the three-year length of the Licenciado program conflicts with EDGE's equivalency, and the evaluator failed to review employment letters as required.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-03-14_01_B5203; source_row=29219 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Entrepreneurs are not listed in section 101(a)(32) of the Act among occupations qualifying as professions, and the Petitioner did not establish that a U.S. baccalaureate degree is the minimum entry requirement for his occupation. Merely identifying a general field is insufficient.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Entrepreneurs are not listed in section 101(a)(32) of the Act among occupations qualifying as professions, and the Petitioner did not establish that a U.S. baccalaureate degree is the minimum entry requirement for his occupation. Merely identifying a general field is insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-03-13_01_B5203; source_row=29209 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c