Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 10371–10380
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
Final Merits Determination
What the decision said
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold requirement of three criteria, but noted the aggregate record does not demonstrate the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold requirement of three criteria, but noted the aggregate record does not demonstrate the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-03-07_01_B2203; source_row=29167 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the exhibitions lacked independent evidence of prestige, the awards were not the highest honors available and lacked evidence of recognition beyond the events, media coverage was limited to two notable articles which do not establish sustained acclaim, and the judging roles were not shown to be reserved for those at the top of the field.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the exhibitions lacked independent evidence of prestige, the awards were not the highest honors available and lacked evidence of recognition beyond the events, media coverage was limited to two notable articles which do not establish sustained acclaim, and the judging roles were not shown to be reserved for those at the top of the field. Taken together, the record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim consistent with extraordinary ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-03-05_01_B2203; source_row=29159 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that while the Petitioner conducted research, her reference letters did not provide specific examples of her findings being implemented or influencing the field, her published and presented work had not been frequently cited by independent researchers, the record did not show she was primarily responsible for obtaining research funding, and her education alone was insufficient to establish she was well positio…
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that while the Petitioner conducted research, her reference letters did not provide specific examples of her findings being implemented or influencing the field, her published and presented work had not been frequently cited by independent researchers, the record did not show she was primarily responsible for obtaining research funding, and her education alone was insufficient to establish she was well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-03-03_01_B5203; source_row=29154 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner did not establish that the roundtables require outstanding achievements of their members as judged by recognized national or international experts, and the supporting letters made only broad, uncorroborated assertions without identifying specific membership requirements or expert judgment.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not establish that the roundtables require outstanding achievements of their members as judged by recognized national or international experts, and the supporting letters made only broad, uncorroborated assertions without identifying specific membership requirements or expert judgment.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-03-03_01_B2203; source_row=29145 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
This criterion applies only to performing artists and requires box office receipts or record/cassette/disk/video sales. The Petitioner is a financial specialist at a bank, not a performing artist, and submitted no qualifying evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
This criterion applies only to performing artists and requires box office receipts or record/cassette/disk/video sales. The Petitioner is a financial specialist at a bank, not a performing artist, and submitted no qualifying evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-03-03_01_B2203; source_row=29151 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
While the documents may qualify as scholarly articles written for learned persons, the Petitioner failed to show they were published in professional or major trade publications or other major media. Posting documents on a company's website is insufficient without evidence establishing the website's standing as a major medium.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
While the documents may qualify as scholarly articles written for learned persons, the Petitioner failed to show they were published in professional or major trade publications or other major media. Posting documents on a company's website is insufficient without evidence establishing the website's standing as a major medium.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-03-03_01_B2203; source_row=29148 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's salary was above average but not demonstrably high relative to others in the field, as record evidence showed multiple comparable roles commanding higher salaries. Additionally, the letter asserting a projected salary was not probative because the criterion requires the individual to have actually commanded a high salary.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's salary was above average but not demonstrably high relative to others in the field, as record evidence showed multiple comparable roles commanding higher salaries. Additionally, the letter asserting a projected salary was not probative because the criterion requires the individual to have actually commanded a high salary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-03-03_01_B2203; source_row=29150 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner failed to show that recruiting individuals for vacancy positions equates to judging the work of others in the same or allied field, and did not demonstrate formal designation as a judge or provide specific details about whom, when, or what work he judged.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner failed to show that recruiting individuals for vacancy positions equates to judging the work of others in the same or allied field, and did not demonstrate formal designation as a judge or provide specific details about whom, when, or what work he judged.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-03-03_01_B2203; source_row=29146 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c