Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 10391–10400
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot established
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Awards
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO's analysis of the one-time award encompassed the criterion (i) alternative argument; the medal pertains to athletics, not the Petitioner's field of law enforcement training.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO's analysis of the one-time award encompassed the criterion (i) alternative argument; the medal pertains to athletics, not the Petitioner's field of law enforcement training.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-03-01_01_B2203; source_row=29129 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner has not established sustained national or international acclaim. His career achievements show influence and success but do not rise to the threshold required. His compensation satisfies step one but does not broadly indicate sustained acclaim; his judging activities and international representations similarly do not establish acclaim at the top of the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner has not established sustained national or international acclaim. His career achievements show influence and success but do not rise to the threshold required. His compensation satisfies step one but does not broadly indicate sustained acclaim; his judging activities and international representations similarly do not establish acclaim at the top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-03-01_01_B2203; source_row=29135 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed the proposed dental practice showed substantial merit but failed to establish national importance. The record showed only local patient-level impact without broader implications for the dental field; HPSA designation and staffing projections addressed local shortages rather than demonstrating nationally important impact; and the projected employment of six individuals and $1.4 million revenue did not constitute s…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the proposed dental practice showed substantial merit but failed to establish national importance. The record showed only local patient-level impact without broader implications for the dental field; HPSA designation and staffing projections addressed local shortages rather than demonstrating nationally important impact; and the projected employment of six individuals and $1.4 million revenue did not constitute substantial positive economic effects at the regional or national level.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-03-01_01_B5203; source_row=29136 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Major awardNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Major award
one-time major internationally recognized award
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the jiu-jitsu medal was in athletics, while the Petitioner's claimed field of expertise and intended future employment is law enforcement training and education. The evidence of acclaim in one field (athletics) cannot satisfy the requirement in a different field (education/law enforcement training).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the jiu-jitsu medal was in athletics, while the Petitioner's claimed field of expertise and intended future employment is law enforcement training and education. The evidence of acclaim in one field (athletics) cannot satisfy the requirement in a different field (education/law enforcement training).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-03-01_01_B2203; source_row=29128 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high remuneration for services
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found criterion (ix) met, noting that according to the submitted documentation there is no salary grade above what the Petitioner received, regardless of whether the comparison group included all officers.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found criterion (ix) met, noting that according to the submitted documentation there is no salary grade above what the Petitioner received, regardless of whether the comparison group included all officers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-03-01_01_B2203; source_row=29134 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the record showed the proposed work has substantial merit (acknowledging the importance of broadband and ICT infrastructure broadly), but did not demonstrate national importance. The Petitioner's consulting company's projected staffing and revenue levels were too modest, and the endeavor would not extend beyond its company and clientele to impact the ICT field or U.S. economy at a national level.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the record showed the proposed work has substantial merit (acknowledging the importance of broadband and ICT infrastructure broadly), but did not demonstrate national importance. The Petitioner's consulting company's projected staffing and revenue levels were too modest, and the endeavor would not extend beyond its company and clientele to impact the ICT field or U.S. economy at a national level.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-02-28_01_B5203; source_row=29117 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Commanded salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability (criterion D)
Why AAO was not persuaded
While AAO agreed the Petitioner should be evaluated against home-country wage statistics, she still failed to establish that the salary payments demonstrated or resulted from exceptional ability.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
While AAO agreed the Petitioner should be evaluated against home-country wage statistics, she still failed to establish that the salary payments demonstrated or resulted from exceptional ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-02-28_02_B5203; source_row=29122 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c