Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Advanced degree or equivalent (bachelor's + 5 years progressive experience)
Why AAO was not persuaded
Employment letters contradicted each other and the Form ETA 750B on hours worked and employment dates. A letter submitted for the first time on appeal was not accepted because the deficiency was flagged in the RFE and the Petitioner failed to respond to it adequately.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Employment letters contradicted each other and the Form ETA 750B on hours worked and employment dates. A letter submitted for the first time on appeal was not accepted because the deficiency was flagged in the RFE and the Petitioner failed to respond to it adequately.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-02-28_02_B5203; source_row=29120 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's academic record satisfies this criterion, while noting that a degree alone is insufficient to demonstrate exceptional ability.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's academic record satisfies this criterion, while noting that a degree alone is insufficient to demonstrate exceptional ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-02-28_02_B5203; source_row=29121 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherProfessor
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that reliance on a single book published seven years prior, with modest citation counts, brief and general letters of support, minimal engagement with post-2015 work, and an informal email exchange about a visiting scholar position collectively failed to establish sustained national or international acclaim or a position at the very top of the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that reliance on a single book published seven years prior, with modest citation counts, brief and general letters of support, minimal engagement with post-2015 work, and an informal email exchange about a visiting scholar position collectively failed to establish sustained national or international acclaim or a position at the very top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-02-25_01_B2203; source_row=29107 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Petitioner failed to show his specific marketing management services would impact the broader U.S. economy at a level commensurate with national importance. His statements and business letters did not show broader implications beyond his immediate employers, and he did not provide evidence of projected job creation, revenue benefits, or substantial positive economic effects.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner failed to show his specific marketing management services would impact the broader U.S. economy at a level commensurate with national importance. His statements and business letters did not show broader implications beyond his immediate employers, and he did not provide evidence of projected job creation, revenue benefits, or substantial positive economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-02-25_01_B5203; source_row=29108 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The certificates themselves are not evidence of their own national or international recognition, do not identify the outstanding achievement that earned inclusion, and the Wikipedia article submitted on appeal lacks reliability and does not indicate that inclusion is a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The certificates themselves are not evidence of their own national or international recognition, do not identify the outstanding achievement that earned inclusion, and the Wikipedia article submitted on appeal lacks reliability and does not indicate that inclusion is a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-02-25_02_B2203; source_row=29111 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
None of the submitted materials are about the Petitioner; rather, they merely include his work in bibliographies or lists of references. A book chapter or press release advertising it does not constitute qualifying published material about the Petitioner.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
None of the submitted materials are about the Petitioner; rather, they merely include his work in bibliographies or lists of references. A book chapter or press release advertising it does not constitute qualifying published material about the Petitioner.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-02-25_02_B2203; source_row=29112 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Biomedical / Life SciencesPhD
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
While the Petitioner's involvement in published research is documented, the record does not establish that his contributions are of major significance. The letters describe his work but do not explain major significance; the citation context from Dimensions helps but is insufficient without independent, objective evidence; and the Petitioner's specific role in the cited mouse model was not established.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
While the Petitioner's involvement in published research is documented, the record does not establish that his contributions are of major significance. The letters describe his work but do not explain major significance; the citation context from Dimensions helps but is insufficient without independent, objective evidence; and the Petitioner's specific role in the cited mouse model was not established.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-02-25_02_B2203; source_row=29114 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the Honorable Mention award nationally recognized because it was presented by Turkey's national government at a ceremony attended by the President of Turkey and received media coverage. The existence of a more prestigious award at the same ceremony does not disqualify the Honorable Mention.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Honorable Mention award nationally recognized because it was presented by Turkey's national government at a ceremony attended by the President of Turkey and received media coverage. The existence of a more prestigious award at the same ceremony does not disqualify the Honorable Mention.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-02-25_01_B2203; source_row=29101 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c