Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 10451–10460

EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot established

Case facts

FinanceFaculty

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that the Beneficiary's peer review activity (5 papers), publication record (7 documents over 6 years), unsupported citation claims, roles, and salary — considered in totality — did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the small percentage at the very top of the field of mathematical research.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Beneficiary's peer review activity (5 papers), publication record (7 documents over 6 years), unsupported citation claims, roles, and salary — considered in totality — did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the small percentage at the very top of the field of mathematical research.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-02-15_01_B2203; source_row=29047
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

FinanceFaculty

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · High remuneration

high salary

Why the evidence was persuasive

Both the Director and AAO agreed the high salary criterion was satisfied; AAO did not separately re-analyze this at step 1.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Both the Director and AAO agreed the high salary criterion was satisfied; AAO did not separately re-analyze this at step 1.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-02-15_01_B2203; source_row=29046
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

FinanceFaculty

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging

Why the evidence was persuasive

Both the Director and AAO agreed the judging criterion was satisfied; AAO did not separately re-analyze this at step 1.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
Both the Director and AAO agreed the judging criterion was satisfied; AAO did not separately re-analyze this at step 1.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-02-15_01_B2203; source_row=29043
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

FinanceFaculty

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role

Why the evidence was persuasive

Both the Director and AAO agreed the leading or critical role criterion was satisfied; AAO did not separately re-analyze this at step 1.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Both the Director and AAO agreed the leading or critical role criterion was satisfied; AAO did not separately re-analyze this at step 1.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-02-15_01_B2203; source_row=29045
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

FinanceFaculty

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

scholarly articles

Why the evidence was persuasive

Both the Director and AAO agreed the scholarly articles criterion was satisfied; AAO did not separately re-analyze this at step 1.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
Both the Director and AAO agreed the scholarly articles criterion was satisfied; AAO did not separately re-analyze this at step 1.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-02-15_01_B2203; source_row=29044
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWEB-1A · MembershipNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in professional associations

Why AAO was not persuaded

The submitted membership card did not bear the Petitioner's name and there was no evidence that the National Wood Carvers Association is a professional organization within the regulatory definition.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The submitted membership card did not bear the Petitioner's name and there was no evidence that the National Wood Carvers Association is a professional organization within the regulatory definition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-02-14_01_B5203; source_row=29040
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · High remuneration

salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability

Why AAO was not persuaded

Petitioner's 2019 U.S. tax return showed only $300 in wages, which the AAO found does not indicate the claimed exceptional ability.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Petitioner's 2019 U.S. tax return showed only $300 in wages, which the AAO found does not indicate the claimed exceptional ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-02-14_01_B5203; source_row=29039
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWten years experienceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

ten years experience

ten years of full-time experience (employer letters)

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner submitted an Employment Record Book rather than employer letters, and the AAO found that this neither qualifies as employer letters nor establishes ten years of full-time experience as a woodcarver.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner submitted an Employment Record Book rather than employer letters, and the AAO found that this neither qualifies as employer letters nor establishes ten years of full-time experience as a woodcarver.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-02-14_01_B5203; source_row=29038
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWacademic recordEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

academic record

official academic record (degree/diploma)

Why the evidence was persuasive

The Petitioner's diploma, transcript, and evaluation establish that he meets this criterion; the AAO withdrew the Director's contrary finding.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's diploma, transcript, and evaluation establish that he meets this criterion; the AAO withdrew the Director's contrary finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-02-14_01_B5203; source_row=29037
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWlicense or certificationNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

license or certification

license or certification (remaining sixth criterion)

What the decision said

The AAO treated the remaining unaddressed criterion as abandoned because the Petitioner did not address it on appeal.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO treated the remaining unaddressed criterion as abandoned because the Petitioner did not address it on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-02-14_01_B5203; source_row=29042
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment