Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 10491–10500
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet Step 1, though it noted the aggregate record does not support the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet Step 1, though it noted the aggregate record does not support the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-01-24_02_B2203; source_row=29010 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Finance
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
What the decision said
AAO reserved this issue as the Petitioner had already failed to meet four of six claimed criteria, making it impossible to reach the threshold of three, so detailed discussion of this criterion could not change the outcome.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved this issue as the Petitioner had already failed to meet four of six claimed criteria, making it impossible to reach the threshold of three, so detailed discussion of this criterion could not change the outcome.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-01-24_01_B2203; source_row=28996 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO explicitly reserved its opinion on the second prong because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first prong, rendering a finding on this prong unnecessary to the outcome.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly reserved its opinion on the second prong because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first prong, rendering a finding on this prong unnecessary to the outcome.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-01-24_01_B5203; source_row=29001 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to waive job offer requirement
What the decision said
AAO explicitly reserved its opinion on the third prong because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first prong, rendering a finding on this prong unnecessary to the outcome.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly reserved its opinion on the third prong because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first prong, rendering a finding on this prong unnecessary to the outcome.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-01-24_01_B5203; source_row=29002 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate national or international recognition of the awards. The media coverage was limited to a local newspaper (La Industria) without objective circulation figures, and selection from a national pool of candidates does not by itself confer national significance. Additionally, the pre-RFE submissions lacked certified English translations, reducing their probative value.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate national or international recognition of the awards. The media coverage was limited to a local newspaper (La Industria) without objective circulation figures, and selection from a national pool of candidates does not by itself confer national significance. Additionally, the pre-RFE submissions lacked certified English translations, reducing their probative value.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-01-21_01_B2203; source_row=28986 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that the published material did not satisfy the criterion. Video clips do not constitute published material under the regulation, the Petitioner conceded inability to provide circulation statistics, and the record lacked objective evidence that the publications had national rather than regional reach. Self-promotional material from publishers and Wikipedia entries were not reliable evidence of major media status.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the published material did not satisfy the criterion. Video clips do not constitute published material under the regulation, the Petitioner conceded inability to provide circulation statistics, and the record lacked objective evidence that the publications had national rather than regional reach. Self-promotional material from publishers and Wikipedia entries were not reliable evidence of major media status.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-01-21_01_B2203; source_row=28987 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that the foreign-language documents lacked certified translations, rendering them of little probative value. Additionally, the Petitioner failed to present evidence that any award was nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field, and circulation statistics for El Universal Caracas were not supported by objective evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the foreign-language documents lacked certified translations, rendering them of little probative value. Additionally, the Petitioner failed to present evidence that any award was nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field, and circulation statistics for El Universal Caracas were not supported by objective evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-01-19_01_B2203; source_row=28979 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO agreed that the El Mundo articles were uncertified and thus of little probative value, the record did not show the Petitioner was a formal member of either organization, the certificate did not confer membership, and no evidence established that recognized national or international experts judged the outstanding achievements of members.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed that the El Mundo articles were uncertified and thus of little probative value, the record did not show the Petitioner was a formal member of either organization, the certificate did not confer membership, and no evidence established that recognized national or international experts judged the outstanding achievements of members.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-01-19_01_B2203; source_row=28980 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO reversed the Director, finding that the uncertified translations did not establish that the submissions accurately supported the Petitioner's claims, the certificates did not clarify the nature of the exhibitions, and the contracts did not indicate that they related to artistic display of her work.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO reversed the Director, finding that the uncertified translations did not establish that the submissions accurately supported the Petitioner's claims, the certificates did not clarify the nature of the exhibitions, and the contracts did not indicate that they related to artistic display of her work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-01-19_01_B2203; source_row=28983 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c