Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
The degree copy and translation did not establish equivalency to a U.S. bachelor's degree. The opinion letters cited on appeal did not qualify as independent credentials evaluations or official school evaluations, and one letter explicitly disclaimed any institutional authority.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The degree copy and translation did not establish equivalency to a U.S. bachelor's degree. The opinion letters cited on appeal did not qualify as independent credentials evaluations or official school evaluations, and one letter explicitly disclaimed any institutional authority.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-12-15_02_B5203; source_row=28923 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the proposed endeavor of oil and gas consulting benefits the Petitioner's employer and clients but fails to establish broader national implications such as significant potential to employ U.S. workers or substantial positive economic effects. The letters of recommendation discuss prior accomplishments rather than the prospective endeavor's national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the proposed endeavor of oil and gas consulting benefits the Petitioner's employer and clients but fails to establish broader national implications such as significant potential to employ U.S. workers or substantial positive economic effects. The letters of recommendation discuss prior accomplishments rather than the prospective endeavor's national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-12-15_01_B5203; source_row=28920 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
At least five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience
Why AAO was not persuaded
The employer letter, written by the majority partner of the Petitioner's own company, lacked specifics on dates, hours, full-time versus part-time status, and progressiveness of experience. The referenced professor's opinion letter was not a qualifying credentials evaluation and thus did not cure these deficiencies.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The employer letter, written by the majority partner of the Petitioner's own company, lacked specifics on dates, hours, full-time versus part-time status, and progressiveness of experience. The referenced professor's opinion letter was not a qualifying credentials evaluation and thus did not cure these deficiencies.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-12-15_02_B5203; source_row=28924 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
Substantial merit and national importance
What the decision said
AAO reserved this prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the underlying EB-2 classification, rendering the national interest waiver analysis unnecessary.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved this prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the underlying EB-2 classification, rendering the national interest waiver analysis unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-12-15_02_B5203; source_row=28926 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
While the work has substantial merit, the prospective impact does not extend beyond Petitioner's future employers and his company's clientele, and Petitioner did not show significant potential to employ U.S. workers or to produce substantial positive economic effects in Florida or nationally.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
While the work has substantial merit, the prospective impact does not extend beyond Petitioner's future employers and his company's clientele, and Petitioner did not show significant potential to employ U.S. workers or to produce substantial positive economic effects in Florida or nationally.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-12-14_01_B5203; source_row=28917 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The newly submitted evidence either described post-filing events, constituted speculative future activities, or was not truly new. Even if considered, none of the activities — speaking engagements, cultural center consulting, or weekend teaching — demonstrated broader implications sufficient to rise to the level of national importance under Dhanasar prong 1.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The newly submitted evidence either described post-filing events, constituted speculative future activities, or was not truly new. Even if considered, none of the activities — speaking engagements, cultural center consulting, or weekend teaching — demonstrated broader implications sufficient to rise to the level of national importance under Dhanasar prong 1.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-12-13_01_B5203; source_row=28914 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO agreed that while the record supports substantial merit, the Petitioner did not show that his coaching work would have prospective impact at a level commensurate with national importance—he did not demonstrate that his involvement would impact the martial arts or U.S. cultural interests broadly, nor that his endeavor had significant potential to employ U.S. workers or generate substantial positive economic effects.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed that while the record supports substantial merit, the Petitioner did not show that his coaching work would have prospective impact at a level commensurate with national importance—he did not demonstrate that his involvement would impact the martial arts or U.S. cultural interests broadly, nor that his endeavor had significant potential to employ U.S. workers or generate substantial positive economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-12-10_01_B5203; source_row=28911 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c