Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 10581–10590

NIWNIW · Well positionedNot established

Case facts

Civil / Structural EngineeringEngineer

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

Why AAO was not persuaded

Because the Petitioner failed to define a specific, consistent proposed endeavor, AAO could not evaluate whether he was well positioned to advance it.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
Because the Petitioner failed to define a specific, consistent proposed endeavor, AAO could not evaluate whether he was well positioned to advance it.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-12-06_01_B5203; source_row=28881
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO found that the Petitioner conflated her personal expertise and experience (relevant to prong two) with the national importance of her specific proposed endeavor. The record contained only general information about the economy and the sales profession, and did not show that her work as a sales manager would impact the tourism industry, U.S.…

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the Petitioner conflated her personal expertise and experience (relevant to prong two) with the national importance of her specific proposed endeavor. The record contained only general information about the economy and the sales profession, and did not show that her work as a sales manager would impact the tourism industry, U.S. economy, or any field more broadly at a level commensurate with national importance. She also failed to establish significant potential for job creation or substantial positive economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-12-06_04_B5203; source_row=28890
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why the evidence was persuasive

Both the Director and AAO agreed that the Petitioner's proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
Both the Director and AAO agreed that the Petitioner's proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-12-06_02_B5203; source_row=28883
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found that the record demonstrates widespread benefits associated with research developments in the Petitioner's field and broad application thereof, and that his track record and ongoing studies offer contributions of such value that they would benefit the United States even assuming other qualified U.S. workers are available.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the record demonstrates widespread benefits associated with research developments in the Petitioner's field and broad application thereof, and that his track record and ongoing studies offer contributions of such value that they would benefit the United States even assuming other qualified U.S. workers are available.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-12-06_02_B5203; source_row=28885
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found that the Petitioner's advanced degrees, numerous cited articles (many as first author), grants, and reference letters from researchers and medical professionals collectively establish that he is well positioned to advance his proposed endeavor.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's advanced degrees, numerous cited articles (many as first author), grants, and reference letters from researchers and medical professionals collectively establish that he is well positioned to advance his proposed endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-12-06_02_B5203; source_row=28884
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Civil / Structural EngineeringEngineer

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to waive job offer requirement

What the decision said

AAO did not separately address the third prong, having resolved the appeal against the Petitioner on the first and second prongs and on misrepresentation grounds.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not separately address the third prong, having resolved the appeal against the Petitioner on the first and second prongs and on misrepresentation grounds.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-12-06_01_B5203; source_row=28882
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

The AAO declined to reach prong two because the Petitioner failed to meet the first prong, making further analysis serve no meaningful purpose.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
The AAO declined to reach prong two because the Petitioner failed to meet the first prong, making further analysis serve no meaningful purpose.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-12-06_04_B5203; source_row=28891
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement

What the decision said

The AAO declined to reach prong three because the Petitioner failed to meet the first prong, making further analysis serve no meaningful purpose.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
The AAO declined to reach prong three because the Petitioner failed to meet the first prong, making further analysis serve no meaningful purpose.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-12-06_04_B5203; source_row=28892
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / ClinicalSenior EngineerMaster’s

Issue evaluated

other

Minimum experience requirement of labor certification (24 months in job offered)

What the decision said

On appeal the Petitioner did not address the experience issue, so AAO deemed it abandoned or waived. AAO nevertheless analyzed the evidence and found it did not satisfy 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1)'s requirements for qualifying experience letters.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
On appeal the Petitioner did not address the experience issue, so AAO deemed it abandoned or waived. AAO nevertheless analyzed the evidence and found it did not satisfy 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1)'s requirements for qualifying experience letters.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-12-03_01_B5203; source_row=28879
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / ClinicalSenior EngineerMaster’s

Issue evaluated

other

Minimum educational requirement of labor certification (master's degree in engineering)

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO concluded that a degree from an institution not accredited by a DOE- or CHEA-recognized organization lacks the basic assurance of acceptable educational quality, and therefore cannot qualify the Beneficiary as an advanced degree professional under the Act.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO concluded that a degree from an institution not accredited by a DOE- or CHEA-recognized organization lacks the basic assurance of acceptable educational quality, and therefore cannot qualify the Beneficiary as an advanced degree professional under the Act.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-12-03_01_B5203; source_row=28878
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment