Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 10621–10630
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or other significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the employer letter insufficient to document actual earnings without corroborating payroll, bank, or tax records, and found the comparative salary data inadequate because it covered all NGO positions rather than senior/executive roles and was accompanied by a publisher caveat about great salary variation. The unpublished AAO decision cited by Petitioner was non-binding and distinguishable.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the employer letter insufficient to document actual earnings without corroborating payroll, bank, or tax records, and found the comparative salary data inadequate because it covered all NGO positions rather than senior/executive roles and was accompanied by a publisher caveat about great salary variation. The unpublished AAO decision cited by Petitioner was non-binding and distinguishable. AAO concluded the Petitioner had not shown legal or policy error in the prior determination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-11-05_01_B2203; source_row=28835 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO had previously found in its appeal decision that the Petitioner demonstrated a critical role with a distinguished organization, satisfying criterion (viii). This finding stands on motion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO had previously found in its appeal decision that the Petitioner demonstrated a critical role with a distinguished organization, satisfying criterion (viii). This finding stands on motion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-11-05_01_B2203; source_row=28834 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's nursing activities benefit specific patients and her workplace but do not demonstrate broader national impact. The advisory opinion and recommendation letters praised her abilities but did not address the national importance requirement. Claims about training others were unsupported by evidence of what methods she offers that differ from existing U.S.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's nursing activities benefit specific patients and her workplace but do not demonstrate broader national impact. The advisory opinion and recommendation letters praised her abilities but did not address the national importance requirement. Claims about training others were unsupported by evidence of what methods she offers that differ from existing U.S. nursing practices or how much time she would spend on teaching.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-11-04_01_B5203; source_row=28828 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Petitioner's proposed endeavor was too vague and inconsistently described to establish national importance. The conflicting information about whether she would work as a professor or researcher, along with inadequate specificity about future activities and insufficient evidence that her research had broad impact beyond academia, precluded a finding of national importance.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's proposed endeavor was too vague and inconsistently described to establish national importance. The conflicting information about whether she would work as a professor or researcher, along with inadequate specificity about future activities and insufficient evidence that her research had broad impact beyond academia, precluded a finding of national importance. Teaching at a specific university, without broader field-wide impact, does not rise to national importance per Dhanasar.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-11-03_01_B5203; source_row=28823 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Petitioner had not persuasively established expertise, a significant role in her field, sustained interest in her work, or independent funding for her research. Her citation record of nine was modest, much of her published work appeared dependent on her former faculty supervisor's platform, and the claimed government funding was either for unrelated consultancy work or insufficiently corroborated.…
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner had not persuasively established expertise, a significant role in her field, sustained interest in her work, or independent funding for her research. Her citation record of nine was modest, much of her published work appeared dependent on her former faculty supervisor's platform, and the claimed government funding was either for unrelated consultancy work or insufficiently corroborated. Her editorial board and peer review activities did not demonstrate she was well positioned to advance her endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-11-03_01_B5203; source_row=28824 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
beneficiary meets labor certification experience requirement by priority date
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO concluded the Beneficiary had at least five years of qualifying post-baccalaureate experience, including two years with the specified tools, by March 5, 2019.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the Beneficiary had at least five years of qualifying post-baccalaureate experience, including two years with the specified tools, by March 5, 2019.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-11-03_02_B5203; source_row=28827 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO resolved the labor certification ambiguity by reference to recruitment materials and concluded the proffered position requires a bachelor's plus five years of experience (or master's plus two), which qualifies as advanced degree professional.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO resolved the labor certification ambiguity by reference to recruitment materials and concluded the proffered position requires a bachelor's plus five years of experience (or master's plus two), which qualifies as advanced degree professional.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-11-03_02_B5203; source_row=28826 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social SciencesPhD
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to waive job offer requirement
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to reach prong three because failure under prongs one and two was independently dispositive, stating that further analysis would serve no meaningful purpose.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach prong three because failure under prongs one and two was independently dispositive, stating that further analysis would serve no meaningful purpose.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-11-03_01_B5203; source_row=28825 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that while the Petitioner received numerous medals and accolades, the limited media coverage of those awards was insufficient to establish national or international recognition in the martial arts field. Conclusory letters from those in the field and self-referential statements from event organizers do not suffice to demonstrate that the awards are nationally or internationally recognized.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that while the Petitioner received numerous medals and accolades, the limited media coverage of those awards was insufficient to establish national or international recognition in the martial arts field. Conclusory letters from those in the field and self-referential statements from event organizers do not suffice to demonstrate that the awards are nationally or internationally recognized.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-11-01_01_B2203; source_row=28819 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner failed to provide independent circulation statistics for the magazine, relying instead on self-promotional publisher letters which USCIS need not credit. Website articles do not automatically constitute major media. Additionally, published material about the Petitioner relates to his role as an athlete/competitor rather than his intended field as a coach, which is a separate area of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner failed to provide independent circulation statistics for the magazine, relying instead on self-promotional publisher letters which USCIS need not credit. Website articles do not automatically constitute major media. Additionally, published material about the Petitioner relates to his role as an athlete/competitor rather than his intended field as a coach, which is a separate area of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-11-01_01_B2203; source_row=28820 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c