Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 10641–10650
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot established
Case facts
Medicine / ClinicalManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO declined to formally reach final merits but indicated the aggregate record does not show sustained national/international acclaim or top-of-field status.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to formally reach final merits but indicated the aggregate record does not show sustained national/international acclaim or top-of-field status.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-10-28_01_B2203; source_row=28806 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Medicine / ClinicalManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that publication in highly-ranked journals, aggregate citation counts, comparison to a single peer, municipal grant funding, conference participation, and founding the department and committee do not, individually or collectively, demonstrate major significance. Recommendation letters were found conclusory and did not articulate specific impact on the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that publication in highly-ranked journals, aggregate citation counts, comparison to a single peer, municipal grant funding, conference participation, and founding the department and committee do not, individually or collectively, demonstrate major significance. Recommendation letters were found conclusory and did not articulate specific impact on the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-10-28_01_B2203; source_row=28804 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concluded the supporting letters lacked specific examples of how Petitioner's performance was critical to the hospital, the [REDACTED] committee, or the Association committee, and that her chairwoman title alone was insufficient. AAO declined to reach the distinguished-reputation question because the critical-role element failed.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the supporting letters lacked specific examples of how Petitioner's performance was critical to the hospital, the [REDACTED] committee, or the Association committee, and that her chairwoman title alone was insufficient. AAO declined to reach the distinguished-reputation question because the critical-role element failed.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-10-28_01_B2203; source_row=28805 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the record supported a finding of substantial merit for the Petitioner's consulting work but that the Petitioner had not shown that the prospective impact of her proposed endeavor rose to the level of national importance. Her business projections were unsupported, and she had not demonstrated that her undertaking would produce substantial positive economic effects regionally or nationally.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the record supported a finding of substantial merit for the Petitioner's consulting work but that the Petitioner had not shown that the prospective impact of her proposed endeavor rose to the level of national importance. Her business projections were unsupported, and she had not demonstrated that her undertaking would produce substantial positive economic effects regionally or nationally.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-10-26_01_B5203; source_row=28799 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed with the Director that the endeavor lacks national importance because the Petitioner focused on the importance of the field generally and general shortages rather than the specific endeavor's broader implications. AAO also noted that COVID-19 references post-dated the March 2018 filing and could not establish eligibility.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the endeavor lacks national importance because the Petitioner focused on the importance of the field generally and general shortages rather than the specific endeavor's broader implications. AAO also noted that COVID-19 references post-dated the March 2018 filing and could not establish eligibility.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-10-20_02_B5203; source_row=28796 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The 2020 events post-date filing and cannot establish eligibility, and the record does not show that the cited competitions confer membership in a professional association as opposed to mere participation in events.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The 2020 events post-date filing and cannot establish eligibility, and the record does not show that the cited competitions confer membership in a professional association as opposed to mere participation in events.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-10-20_01_B5203; source_row=28794 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
Post-filing earnings cannot establish eligibility, the record lacks documentary support for the claimed viewership numbers (which AAO contradicted via administrative notice), and there is no showing of remuneration indicative of exceptional ability relative to others in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Post-filing earnings cannot establish eligibility, the record lacks documentary support for the claimed viewership numbers (which AAO contradicted via administrative notice), and there is no showing of remuneration indicative of exceptional ability relative to others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-10-20_01_B5203; source_row=28793 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWlicense or certificationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
license or certification
license or certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
Pre-fight medical screenings assess fitness to participate in a particular competition and are not a license or certification to practice the profession; Petitioner cited no law or policy supporting an 'implicit certification' theory.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Pre-fight medical screenings assess fitness to participate in a particular competition and are not a license or certification to practice the profession; Petitioner cited no law or policy supporting an 'implicit certification' theory.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-10-20_01_B5203; source_row=28792 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c