Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 10661–10670
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to waive job offer and labor certification
What the decision said
AAO did not reach the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the first and second prongs.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not reach the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the first and second prongs.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-10-12_01_B5203; source_row=28780 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AI21 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner argued that her contributions to an autonomous robotic system, including dataset downloads exceeding 50,000, media coverage, citation counts, and expert letters, demonstrated major significance.…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner argued that her contributions to an autonomous robotic system, including dataset downloads exceeding 50,000, media coverage, citation counts, and expert letters, demonstrated major significance. AAO found that dataset downloads lacked comparative context and did not correlate well with actual use or citation, that citation counts were modest and acknowledged by the Petitioner herself as 'not impressive,' that media coverage described the project as early-stage without demonstrating demonstrated impact, and that expert letters spoke to future potential rather than existing major influence in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-10-08_01_B2203; source_row=28773 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI21 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in the alternative that the record did not demonstrate the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in the alternative that the record did not demonstrate the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-10-08_01_B2203; source_row=28777 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Both the Director and AAO found this criterion met based on the Petitioner's published work in IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters and presentations at international conferences.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
Both the Director and AAO found this criterion met based on the Petitioner's published work in IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters and presentations at international conferences.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-10-08_01_B2203; source_row=28774 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that reference letters spoke to the broader economic impact of the oil and gas industry or of the Petitioner's employer, not the national importance of her specific role as a finance manager. Evidence about job creation, environmental benefits, and national security lacked close linkage to her specific proposed endeavor. Alleged AIPN contributions were unsubstantiated by evidence in the record.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that reference letters spoke to the broader economic impact of the oil and gas industry or of the Petitioner's employer, not the national importance of her specific role as a finance manager. Evidence about job creation, environmental benefits, and national security lacked close linkage to her specific proposed endeavor. Alleged AIPN contributions were unsubstantiated by evidence in the record.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-10-05_01_B5203; source_row=28768 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Finance
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's education and experience in financial management and track record of success with her current employer established that she is well positioned to advance her proposed endeavor.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's education and experience in financial management and track record of success with her current employer established that she is well positioned to advance her proposed endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-10-05_01_B5203; source_row=28769 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found that although the substantial merit portion was uncontested, the Petitioner failed to establish national importance. His internal documents and colleague emails did not show original innovations or broader industry impact, and his general assertions about his employer's economic contributions conflated the importance of the industry with the prospective impact of his specific proposed work.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that although the substantial merit portion was uncontested, the Petitioner failed to establish national importance. His internal documents and colleague emails did not show original innovations or broader industry impact, and his general assertions about his employer's economic contributions conflated the importance of the industry with the prospective impact of his specific proposed work. The record did not show that his proposed endeavor stood to extend beyond his employer and its projects to impact the engineering/infrastructure field at a national level.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-10-04_01_B5203; source_row=28765 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed the Petitioner failed prong two. His citation count of 28 (highest single work: 17) was insufficient to show the requisite level of interest; recommendation letters did not provide specific examples of commercial implementation or industry impact; his funding was as a non-primary researcher on collaborative projects; and the fellowship award was a team effort.…
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the Petitioner failed prong two. His citation count of 28 (highest single work: 17) was insufficient to show the requisite level of interest; recommendation letters did not provide specific examples of commercial implementation or industry impact; his funding was as a non-primary researcher on collaborative projects; and the fellowship award was a team effort. His record did not demonstrate the progress, record of success, or generation of interest required by Dhanasar.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-30_01_B5203; source_row=28763 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c