Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 10681–10690

EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed Senior Member requirements do not equate to 'outstanding achievements,' noting the IEEE's separate Fellow grade aligns more closely with the regulatory language, and that the record did not show prospective Senior Members are judged by recognized national or international experts.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed Senior Member requirements do not equate to 'outstanding achievements,' noting the IEEE's separate Fellow grade aligns more closely with the regulatory language, and that the record did not show prospective Senior Members are judged by recognized national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-22_03_B2203; source_row=28747
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO concluded the aggregate record does not show sustained acclaim or that Petitioner is at the very top of his field.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the aggregate record does not show sustained acclaim or that Petitioner is at the very top of his field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-22_03_B2203; source_row=28752
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed the evidence did not show impact beyond Petitioner's employer and clientele, and that letters lacked specifics about how his contributions influenced the broader field.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the evidence did not show impact beyond Petitioner's employer and clientele, and that letters lacked specifics about how his contributions influenced the broader field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-22_03_B2203; source_row=28749
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging the work of others

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed the peer review evidence satisfied this criterion.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the peer review evidence satisfied this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-22_03_B2203; source_row=28748
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed the founding-member role at a distinguished organization satisfied this criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the founding-member role at a distinguished organization satisfied this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-22_03_B2203; source_row=28750
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed the criterion was met and did not disturb the Director's conclusion, though AAO disagreed with the Director's reasoning that the 'Supporting Actress' distinction diminished the award's significance.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the criterion was met and did not disturb the Director's conclusion, though AAO disagreed with the Director's reasoning that the 'Supporting Actress' distinction diminished the award's significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-22_01_B2203; source_row=28731
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim at the top of the field

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found the Director erred in discounting the Best Supporting Actress award on the basis of the role category. Considering the totality of evidence — award, sustained media coverage, attestations from prominent figures — the Petitioner established a decades-long prominent career and sustained national acclaim, satisfying the final merits standard.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director erred in discounting the Best Supporting Actress award on the basis of the role category. Considering the totality of evidence — award, sustained media coverage, attestations from prominent figures — the Petitioner established a decades-long prominent career and sustained national acclaim, satisfying the final merits standard.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-22_01_B2203; source_row=28737
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Commercial successReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Commercial success

commercial success in the performing arts

What the decision said

AAO reserved judgment on this criterion as it was unnecessary to reach. AAO separately noted that unsupported assertions of sold-out performances and top-rated programs, without corroborating documentation, do not establish commercial success.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO reserved judgment on this criterion as it was unnecessary to reach. AAO separately noted that unsupported assertions of sold-out performances and top-rated programs, without corroborating documentation, do not establish commercial success.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-22_01_B2203; source_row=28736
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments

What the decision said

AAO reserved judgment on this criterion as it was unnecessary to reach given that three criteria were already met.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO reserved judgment on this criterion as it was unnecessary to reach given that three criteria were already met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-22_01_B2203; source_row=28735
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

Published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or major media

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO accepted the Director's finding that media coverage satisfied this criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO accepted the Director's finding that media coverage satisfied this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-22_02_B2203; source_row=28744
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment