Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 10771–10780
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / ManagementMaster’s
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO noted that the Petitioner's skills and experience relate to prong two but explicitly declined to reach this prong because prong one was not satisfied, stating that further analysis would serve no meaningful purpose.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted that the Petitioner's skills and experience relate to prong two but explicitly declined to reach this prong because prong one was not satisfied, stating that further analysis would serve no meaningful purpose.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-15_08_B5203; source_row=28642 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concluded the endeavor primarily benefits the Petitioner and his clients without broader implications, and that creating 11 jobs over five years was not shown to constitute substantial positive economic effects.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the endeavor primarily benefits the Petitioner and his clients without broader implications, and that creating 11 jobs over five years was not shown to constitute substantial positive economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-15_07_B5203; source_row=28638 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
fraud or willful misrepresentation of material fact
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO independently developed the misrepresentation issue via a NOID after reviewing the record; petitioner's only response was counsel's withdrawal letter. AAO concluded misrepresentation of authorship was willful and material.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO independently developed the misrepresentation issue via a NOID after reviewing the record; petitioner's only response was counsel's withdrawal letter. AAO concluded misrepresentation of authorship was willful and material.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-15_03_B5203; source_row=28630 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
Final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold evidentiary requirements. In dicta, AAO noted that the record in the aggregate does not support a finding of the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold evidentiary requirements. In dicta, AAO noted that the record in the aggregate does not support a finding of the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-15_02_B2203; source_row=28626 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWprocedural or otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
procedural or other
motion to reconsider - incorrect application of law or policy
Why AAO was not persuaded
Petitioner did not identify any incorrect application of law or policy; instead she misquoted Matter of Ramos (which addresses BIA, not USCIS, motion practice) and urged AAO to interpret Dhanasar by analogy to the EB-5 program without supporting authority.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Petitioner did not identify any incorrect application of law or policy; instead she misquoted Matter of Ramos (which addresses BIA, not USCIS, motion practice) and urged AAO to interpret Dhanasar by analogy to the EB-5 program without supporting authority.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-15_12_B5203; source_row=28654 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWprocedural or otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
procedural or other
motion to reopen - new facts requirement
Why AAO was not persuaded
Petitioner's submissions either duplicated existing evidence, addressed post-filing facts (e.g., COVID-19, 2019 regulations), or addressed geographic areas different from the endeavor's location, and did not address the dispositive question of significant potential to employ U.S. workers or substantial positive economic effects.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Petitioner's submissions either duplicated existing evidence, addressed post-filing facts (e.g., COVID-19, 2019 regulations), or addressed geographic areas different from the endeavor's location, and did not address the dispositive question of significant potential to employ U.S. workers or substantial positive economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-15_12_B5203; source_row=28653 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c