Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 10781–10790
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO explicitly reserved opinion on the second Dhanasar prong because the first prong was not met and resolution of the second prong was unnecessary to the outcome.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly reserved opinion on the second Dhanasar prong because the first prong was not met and resolution of the second prong was unnecessary to the outcome.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-15_14_B5203; source_row=28659 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to waive job offer and labor certification
What the decision said
AAO explicitly reserved opinion on the third Dhanasar prong because the first prong was not met and resolution of the third prong was unnecessary to the outcome.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly reserved opinion on the third Dhanasar prong because the first prong was not met and resolution of the third prong was unnecessary to the outcome.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-15_14_B5203; source_row=28660 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO concluded the proposed endeavor lacks national importance. The Petitioner's work on internal manufacturing processes at one company and his briefly-described future research projects were not shown to have broader prospective impact, and the supporting documents did not specifically address his proposed endeavor.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the proposed endeavor lacks national importance. The Petitioner's work on internal manufacturing processes at one company and his briefly-described future research projects were not shown to have broader prospective impact, and the supporting documents did not specifically address his proposed endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-14_02_B5203; source_row=28595 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that because the Petitioner started working in tourism before earning her first bachelor's degree, her positions did not require a bachelor's degree, and therefore the occupation does not qualify as a 'profession' under the regulatory definition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that because the Petitioner started working in tourism before earning her first bachelor's degree, her positions did not require a bachelor's degree, and therefore the occupation does not qualify as a 'profession' under the regulatory definition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-14_04_B5203; source_row=28601 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's vague and inconsistent descriptions of her proposed endeavor, reliance on generalizations about the tourism industry, and a business plan assembled from unidentified sources did not establish the national importance of her specific proposed work.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's vague and inconsistent descriptions of her proposed endeavor, reliance on generalizations about the tourism industry, and a business plan assembled from unidentified sources did not establish the national importance of her specific proposed work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-14_04_B5203; source_row=28602 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found substantial merit was established (withdrawing the Director on that point) but national importance was not. The endeavor's prospective impact does not extend beyond the Petitioner's own company and clientele, and the projected employment and economic effects are not substantial enough to meet the Dhanasar standard.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found substantial merit was established (withdrawing the Director on that point) but national importance was not. The endeavor's prospective impact does not extend beyond the Petitioner's own company and clientele, and the projected employment and economic effects are not substantial enough to meet the Dhanasar standard.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-14_03_B5203; source_row=28598 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
exceptional salary or remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner failed to provide salary data for her specific Ukrainian region or evidence she actually received a salary (no tax documents, pay stubs, or bank statements). Moreover, even an above-average salary alone does not demonstrate exceptional ability relative to others in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner failed to provide salary data for her specific Ukrainian region or evidence she actually received a salary (no tax documents, pay stubs, or bank statements). Moreover, even an above-average salary alone does not demonstrate exceptional ability relative to others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-14_01_B5203; source_row=28589 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The academic equivalency evaluation lacked sufficient analysis of course content equivalencies and had unexplained conversion of academic hours to credits. The Petitioner's ECTS credits fell below minimum requirements for both her specialist and master diplomas, and the doctoral program was insufficiently documented.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The academic equivalency evaluation lacked sufficient analysis of course content equivalencies and had unexplained conversion of academic hours to credits. The Petitioner's ECTS credits fell below minimum requirements for both her specialist and master diplomas, and the doctoral program was insufficiently documented. Even assuming a bachelor's degree, employer letters were insufficient to establish five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-14_01_B5203; source_row=28585 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
Salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability
Why AAO was not persuaded
The income documents were ambiguous as to currency, frequency, and pre-filing deposits. Even if salary could be established, comparison to U.S. median wages was not appropriate since the salary appeared to be earned abroad, and evidence of above-median salary does not alone demonstrate exceptional ability.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The income documents were ambiguous as to currency, frequency, and pre-filing deposits. Even if salary could be established, comparison to U.S. median wages was not appropriate since the salary appeared to be earned abroad, and evidence of above-median salary does not alone demonstrate exceptional ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-14_05_B5203; source_row=28608 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c