Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 1071–1080
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherBachelor’s
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the petitioner
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO disagreed with the Director's field characterization, finding some articles substantially discussed her work and that journalism relates to her field. However, the Petitioner failed to demonstrate that any publications constitute professional or major trade publications, or other major media, as independent evidence of circulation or audience was lacking.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director's field characterization, finding some articles substantially discussed her work and that journalism relates to her field. However, the Petitioner failed to demonstrate that any publications constitute professional or major trade publications, or other major media, as independent evidence of circulation or audience was lacking.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-03-25_02_B2203; source_row=43619 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim at top of field
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's awards are largely from earlier in his career, with recent competition participation unverified and at lower-level regional events; his published material is a single 2005 interview; his association memberships and judging activity are outdated; and his coaching record does not demonstrate he has reached the top of that profession.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's awards are largely from earlier in his career, with recent competition participation unverified and at lower-level regional events; his published material is a single 2005 interview; his association memberships and judging activity are outdated; and his coaching record does not demonstrate he has reached the top of that profession. The totality of evidence does not show sustained acclaim at the top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-03-25_01_B2203; source_row=43616 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO held the news agency website is not an artistic exhibition or showcase, and the journalism awards event was educational rather than artistic in nature. AAO further found the Petitioner did not show his report actually played at the ceremony.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO held the news agency website is not an artistic exhibition or showcase, and the journalism awards event was educational rather than artistic in nature. AAO further found the Petitioner did not show his report actually played at the ceremony.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-03-25_03_B2203; source_row=43629 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the news agency role was that of one of many regional video contributors, not leading or critical, and that the LLC role evidence was insufficient to show a leading/critical role and the company's distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the news agency role was that of one of many regional video contributors, not leading or critical, and that the LLC role evidence was insufficient to show a leading/critical role and the company's distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-03-25_03_B2203; source_row=43630 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
What the decision said
The Petitioner did not address or contest the Director's findings on national importance on appeal, so the AAO deemed this prong waived. The waiver is dispositive of the entire appeal.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not address or contest the Director's findings on national importance on appeal, so the AAO deemed this prong waived. The waiver is dispositive of the entire appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-03-25_05_B5203; source_row=43637 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
recognition for achievements and significant contributions
Why AAO was not persuaded
The recommendation letters described the Petitioner's competence and expertise but did not explain how her work constituted recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field. The letters were not accompanied by corroborative evidence of the impact or broader recognition of her work beyond her customers.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The recommendation letters described the Petitioner's competence and expertise but did not explain how her work constituted recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field. The letters were not accompanied by corroborative evidence of the impact or broader recognition of her work beyond her customers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-03-25_14_B5203; source_row=43668 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWten years experienceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / ManagementBachelor’s
Issue evaluated
ten years experience
ten years full-time experience
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's own letter as owner of her company did not state whether she worked on a full-time basis, and her statement referencing her submitted evidence is insufficient without corroborating probative evidence. The record does not cumulatively demonstrate at least ten years of full-time experience.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's own letter as owner of her company did not state whether she worked on a full-time basis, and her statement referencing her submitted evidence is insufficient without corroborating probative evidence. The record does not cumulatively demonstrate at least ten years of full-time experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-03-25_14_B5203; source_row=43666 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c