Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the advisory opinion contained conclusory assertions without specific examples, did not show contributions to the field beyond the Petitioner's employers, and was of little probative value. Recommendation letters described achievements that did not appear to have impacted the business administration field as a whole. Training certificates and volunteer work were unexplained as contributions to the industry.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the advisory opinion contained conclusory assertions without specific examples, did not show contributions to the field beyond the Petitioner's employers, and was of little probative value. Recommendation letters described achievements that did not appear to have impacted the business administration field as a whole. Training certificates and volunteer work were unexplained as contributions to the industry.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-13_05_B5203; source_row=28578 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience through self-employment
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record contained unresolved inconsistencies about the clinic's physical location across multiple documents, the tax certificates did not link the Petitioner's income to the clinic, personal asset documents did not demonstrate the requisite experience, and the reference letters lacked sufficient detail about his self-employment and contained credibility-undermining inconsistencies.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record contained unresolved inconsistencies about the clinic's physical location across multiple documents, the tax certificates did not link the Petitioner's income to the clinic, personal asset documents did not demonstrate the requisite experience, and the reference letters lacked sufficient detail about his self-employment and contained credibility-undermining inconsistencies.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-13_02_B5203; source_row=28562 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the opinion letters conflated the Petitioner's knowledge and skills (relevant to prong 2) with national importance of the specific endeavor (prong 1), and contained only conclusory or vague statements. The record did not show that the proposed endeavor would impact the supply chain logistics field or U.S. economy more broadly beyond the Petitioner's employer and clients.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the opinion letters conflated the Petitioner's knowledge and skills (relevant to prong 2) with national importance of the specific endeavor (prong 1), and contained only conclusory or vague statements. The record did not show that the proposed endeavor would impact the supply chain logistics field or U.S. economy more broadly beyond the Petitioner's employer and clients. New evidence submitted on appeal was rejected because the Petitioner had prior notice of the deficiency and opportunity to respond.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-10_01_B5203; source_row=28546 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Commercial success in the performing arts (criterion x)
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner failed to establish this criterion both directly and as comparable evidence. Stream/view counts were vague and lacked evidence showing they represent commercial success; DVD sales figures were insufficient without industry benchmarks; subscription revenue was too limited to establish commercial success.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner failed to establish this criterion both directly and as comparable evidence. Stream/view counts were vague and lacked evidence showing they represent commercial success; DVD sales figures were insufficient without industry benchmarks; subscription revenue was too limited to establish commercial success.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-09_04_B2203; source_row=28544 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases (criterion vii)
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO disagreed with the Director's narrow reading of the criterion (withdrawing that aspect of the decision) but still found the criterion unmet because the Petitioner failed to establish that her displays were artistic in nature, and the conventions were focused on industry promotion rather than art.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director's narrow reading of the criterion (withdrawing that aspect of the decision) but still found the criterion unmet because the Petitioner failed to establish that her displays were artistic in nature, and the conventions were focused on industry promotion rather than art.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-09_04_B2203; source_row=28542 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments (criterion viii)
Why AAO was not persuaded
New evidence on appeal was excluded because the Petitioner had declined to submit it at the RFE stage. While the Petitioner established a leading/critical role for one company she co-founded, she failed to demonstrate that company had a distinguished reputation. Other roles lacked sufficient detail to show they were leading or critical.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
New evidence on appeal was excluded because the Petitioner had declined to submit it at the RFE stage. While the Petitioner established a leading/critical role for one company she co-founded, she failed to demonstrate that company had a distinguished reputation. Other roles lacked sufficient detail to show they were leading or critical.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-09_04_B2203; source_row=28543 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim
What the decision said
AAO identifies two errors: failure to consider the totality of the evidence and application of an incorrect standard requiring awards and media coverage to show 'influence' in the field. AAO remands for a new decision with a proper totality analysis.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO identifies two errors: failure to consider the totality of the evidence and application of an incorrect standard requiring awards and media coverage to show 'influence' in the field. AAO remands for a new decision with a proper totality analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-09_03_B2203; source_row=28536 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c