Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 10871–10880
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager2,012 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments
What the decision said
AAO reserved this issue because, even if resolved in the Petitioner's favor, it could not change the outcome of the appeal given that the Petitioner had already failed to meet the three-criteria threshold.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved this issue because, even if resolved in the Petitioner's favor, it could not change the outcome of the appeal given that the Petitioner had already failed to meet the three-criteria threshold.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-02_03_B2203; source_row=28505 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI68 citations
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the Petitioner demonstrated his proposed endeavor falls within science and technology (showing substantial merit) and has national and global implications within computer science (reflecting national importance). The Director had failed to address relevant evidence and arguments in the cover letter.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner demonstrated his proposed endeavor falls within science and technology (showing substantial merit) and has national and global implications within computer science (reflecting national importance). The Director had failed to address relevant evidence and arguments in the cover letter.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-02_03_B5203; source_row=28508 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
Substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the endeavor had substantial merit but not national importance. The clinical work would impact only the patients she serves; the academic plan was vague and lacked evidence of original innovations; the relevant inquiry is the specific proposed endeavor's broader implications, not the general importance of the nursing profession; and the expert letter was given little weight because it focused on the Petitioner's…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the endeavor had substantial merit but not national importance. The clinical work would impact only the patients she serves; the academic plan was vague and lacked evidence of original innovations; the relevant inquiry is the specific proposed endeavor's broader implications, not the general importance of the nursing profession; and the expert letter was given little weight because it focused on the Petitioner's qualifications rather than the prospective impact of her specific endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-01_04_B5203; source_row=28491 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the Director accepted national importance without adequately considering whether sufficient evidence supported that conclusion, and without a comprehensive analysis of the first prong — the foundation for the entire Dhanasar analysis.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Director accepted national importance without adequately considering whether sufficient evidence supported that conclusion, and without a comprehensive analysis of the first prong — the foundation for the entire Dhanasar analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-01_01_B5203; source_row=28478 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO finds the diploma does not show award of a bachelor's degree, the credential evaluations are conclusory or contradicted by FCCPT, and the employment letters do not establish five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO finds the diploma does not show award of a bachelor's degree, the credential evaluations are conclusory or contradicted by FCCPT, and the employment letters do not establish five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-01_02_B5203; source_row=28481 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c