Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 10911–10920
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Finance
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to analyze the second prong because the Petitioner failed to meet the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to analyze the second prong because the Petitioner failed to meet the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-30_02_B5203; source_row=28464 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the proposed endeavor was not specifically articulated, no nexus to a particular field could be assessed, and there was no evidence of substantial positive economic effects or job creation.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the proposed endeavor was not specifically articulated, no nexus to a particular field could be assessed, and there was no evidence of substantial positive economic effects or job creation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-30_03_B5203; source_row=28466 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences68 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO had previously reserved a determination on this criterion. The Court analyzed the documentation and found the Petitioner did not satisfy the leading or critical role criterion; AAO accepted this finding on remand. Nonetheless, four other criteria were met, satisfying step one.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO had previously reserved a determination on this criterion. The Court analyzed the documentation and found the Petitioner did not satisfy the leading or critical role criterion; AAO accepted this finding on remand. Nonetheless, four other criteria were met, satisfying step one.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-27_01_B2203; source_row=28446 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences68 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions
Why the evidence was persuasive
The U.S. District Court found the Petitioner submitted evidence sufficient to establish the original contributions criterion, and AAO accepted that finding on remand.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The U.S. District Court found the Petitioner submitted evidence sufficient to establish the original contributions criterion, and AAO accepted that finding on remand.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-27_01_B2203; source_row=28444 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences68 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary
What the decision said
The Court noted that because the Petitioner did not contest the Director's high-salary determination on appeal, the issue was waived and not considered.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Court noted that because the Petitioner did not contest the Director's high-salary determination on appeal, the issue was waived and not considered.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-27_01_B2203; source_row=28447 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences68 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the totality of evidence demonstrates sustained national and international acclaim and that the Petitioner is among the very top of his field, based on prolific peer-cited publications, expert attestations to major-significance contributions, industry press coverage, and high venture capital investment tied to his patented innovations.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the totality of evidence demonstrates sustained national and international acclaim and that the Petitioner is among the very top of his field, based on prolific peer-cited publications, expert attestations to major-significance contributions, industry press coverage, and high venture capital investment tied to his patented innovations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-27_01_B2203; source_row=28448 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences68 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published materials
Why the evidence was persuasive
The U.S. District Court found the Petitioner submitted evidence sufficient to establish the published materials criterion, and AAO accepted that finding on remand.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The U.S. District Court found the Petitioner submitted evidence sufficient to establish the published materials criterion, and AAO accepted that finding on remand.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-27_01_B2203; source_row=28443 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO had previously reserved a determination on this criterion. The Court analyzed the documentation and found the Petitioner met the scholarly articles criterion; AAO accepted this finding on remand.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO had previously reserved a determination on this criterion. The Court analyzed the documentation and found the Petitioner met the scholarly articles criterion; AAO accepted this finding on remand.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-27_01_B2203; source_row=28445 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO finds the proposed financial advisory endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance because its impact does not extend beyond the Petitioner's clientele or significantly affect the broader U.S. economy or financial services industry.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO finds the proposed financial advisory endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance because its impact does not extend beyond the Petitioner's clientele or significantly affect the broader U.S. economy or financial services industry.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-26_01_B5203; source_row=28439 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c