Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 10921–10930
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO conducted the final merits determination de novo and found the totality of the evidence established sustained acclaim and very-top-of-field placement.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO conducted the final merits determination de novo and found the totality of the evidence established sustained acclaim and very-top-of-field placement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-26_01_B2203; source_row=28438 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Gold and Double Platinum certifications (audited industry-wide indicators), the personal plaque awarded to the Petitioner, and media articles identifying him as co-producer and close collaborator established his contributions to the album's commercial success.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Gold and Double Platinum certifications (audited industry-wide indicators), the personal plaque awarded to the Petitioner, and media articles identifying him as co-producer and close collaborator established his contributions to the album's commercial success.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-26_01_B2203; source_row=28437 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the Petitioner's voting membership in The Recording Academy, exercised across three editions of the Grammy Awards, satisfies the judging criterion because it gives him influence over selection of award winners.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's voting membership in The Recording Academy, exercised across three editions of the Grammy Awards, satisfies the judging criterion because it gives him influence over selection of award winners.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-26_01_B2203; source_row=28436 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
labor certification demonstrates position requires exceptional ability
Why AAO was not persuaded
Only one of the six evidentiary categories (degree requirement) is reflected in the labor certification's terms; the remaining categories (10+ years experience, license, salary, professional membership, recognition) are not, so the certification does not show the position requires expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Only one of the six evidentiary categories (degree requirement) is reflected in the labor certification's terms; the remaining categories (10+ years experience, license, salary, professional membership, recognition) are not, so the certification does not show the position requires expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-25_01_B5203; source_row=28430 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
five years of progressive post-baccalaureate qualifying experience
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO independently found the experience evidence insufficient: the [REDACTED] W-2 amounts did not support full-time employment in 2013 and 2015; corporate filings showed the Beneficiary as president/sole officer of one purported employer rather than rehab director; and a brother-in-law's role as principal of three purported employers undermined the reliability of the employment letters.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO independently found the experience evidence insufficient: the [REDACTED] W-2 amounts did not support full-time employment in 2013 and 2015; corporate filings showed the Beneficiary as president/sole officer of one purported employer rather than rehab director; and a brother-in-law's role as principal of three purported employers undermined the reliability of the employment letters. Foreign experience claimed in India was discounted as pre-baccalaureate and omitted from the labor certification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-25_02_B5203; source_row=28431 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
U.S. bachelor's degree or foreign equivalent in qualifying field
What the decision said
AAO found the Director's decision did not adequately explain any denial on educational grounds, accepted a forensic handwriting expert opinion submitted on appeal because the Director had not previously notified the Petitioner of her doubts, and remanded for the Director to review the expert opinion and explain any educational-grounds denial in writing.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's decision did not adequately explain any denial on educational grounds, accepted a forensic handwriting expert opinion submitted on appeal because the Director had not previously notified the Petitioner of her doubts, and remanded for the Director to review the expert opinion and explain any educational-grounds denial in writing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-25_02_B5203; source_row=28432 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that while the Petitioner demonstrated substantial merit, the record did not show that the proposed endeavor has broader implications beyond his immediate clients. The business plan projections of modest staffing and revenues did not rise to substantial positive economic effects, the supporting letters did not demonstrate national importance, and the Petitioner's industry-level statistics did not speak to the nat…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that while the Petitioner demonstrated substantial merit, the record did not show that the proposed endeavor has broader implications beyond his immediate clients. The business plan projections of modest staffing and revenues did not rise to substantial positive economic effects, the supporting letters did not demonstrate national importance, and the Petitioner's industry-level statistics did not speak to the national importance of his specific proposed endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-24_02_B5203; source_row=28418 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c