Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 10931–10940
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
While the record supported substantial merit for the Petitioner's proposed IT project management work, the Petitioner did not provide documentary evidence showing the broader prospective impact of his specific endeavor.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
While the record supported substantial merit for the Petitioner's proposed IT project management work, the Petitioner did not provide documentary evidence showing the broader prospective impact of his specific endeavor. His PhD research lacked evidence of broader impact on the IT project management field, his proposed job offer lacked documentation of duties and projects, and the industry articles about predictive policing did not specifically address his proposed endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-24_03_B5203; source_row=28421 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found substantial merit established but not national importance, because the proposed consulting work would benefit individual clients without broader impact on the field or industry, and the Petitioner failed to show his business would yield substantial positive economic effects, significant U.S. employment, or operate in an economically depressed area.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found substantial merit established but not national importance, because the proposed consulting work would benefit individual clients without broader impact on the field or industry, and the Petitioner failed to show his business would yield substantial positive economic effects, significant U.S. employment, or operate in an economically depressed area.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-24_05_B5203; source_row=28427 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the record supported substantial merit given the documented shortage of engineers in Florida, but the Petitioner failed to demonstrate that his proposed endeavor would have prospective impact beyond his own company and clientele rising to national importance.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the record supported substantial merit given the documented shortage of engineers in Florida, but the Petitioner failed to demonstrate that his proposed endeavor would have prospective impact beyond his own company and clientele rising to national importance. The business plan's staffing and revenue forecasts were unsupported, and letters from the Petitioner and a business contact contained unresolved inconsistencies undermining their probative value.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-24_04_B5203; source_row=28424 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO finds the totality of evidence — including high-profile COVID-19 nephrology research with major media coverage, JASN's recognition, citations in UPTODATE and KSAP, leadership in research consortia, and consistent expert testimony — establishes sustained national/international acclaim and top-of-field status.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO finds the totality of evidence — including high-profile COVID-19 nephrology research with major media coverage, JASN's recognition, citations in UPTODATE and KSAP, leadership in research consortia, and consistent expert testimony — establishes sustained national/international acclaim and top-of-field status.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-24_01_B2203; source_row=28414 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
What the decision said
AAO withdraws the Director's prong 1 finding because it appears to have been based at least in part on the Petitioner's education, which itself was not properly assessed. The prong is remanded for proper analysis.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdraws the Director's prong 1 finding because it appears to have been based at least in part on the Petitioner's education, which itself was not properly assessed. The prong is remanded for proper analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-24_01_B5203; source_row=28415 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement
What the decision said
AAO found the Director's failure to conduct a proper third-prong analysis was error. The matter is remanded for a full Dhanasar analysis of the third prong.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's failure to conduct a proper third-prong analysis was error. The matter is remanded for a full Dhanasar analysis of the third prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-24_01_B5203; source_row=28417 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c