Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 10971–10980
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications
Why the evidence was persuasive
Both the Director and AAO found the Petitioner satisfied criterion (iii) based on published material about him in professional and major trade publications.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Both the Director and AAO found the Petitioner satisfied criterion (iii) based on published material about him in professional and major trade publications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-20_01_B2203; source_row=28371 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why the evidence was persuasive
Both the Director and AAO found the Petitioner satisfied criterion (vii) based on the display of his work at artistic exhibitions or showcases, namely major film festivals.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Both the Director and AAO found the Petitioner satisfied criterion (vii) based on the display of his work at artistic exhibitions or showcases, namely major film festivals.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-20_01_B2203; source_row=28372 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the totality of evidence, including consistent recognition since 2008, multiple prestigious award nominations, widespread trade publication coverage, exclusive membership in an elite professional society with just over 100 fully accredited members, and letters from talent representatives about prominent upcoming projects and high remuneration, collectively demonstrated sustained national and international acc…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the totality of evidence, including consistent recognition since 2008, multiple prestigious award nominations, widespread trade publication coverage, exclusive membership in an elite professional society with just over 100 fully accredited members, and letters from talent representatives about prominent upcoming projects and high remuneration, collectively demonstrated sustained national and international acclaim and placement among the small percentage at the very top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-20_01_B2203; source_row=28373 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's proposed endeavor lacks national importance. The relevant question is the impact of the specific endeavor — providing youth outreach ministerial services — not the general importance of the industry.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's proposed endeavor lacks national importance. The relevant question is the impact of the specific endeavor — providing youth outreach ministerial services — not the general importance of the industry. The Petitioner's evidence did not show the endeavor's potential prospective impact extended beyond a local level, nor did it establish significant job creation or substantial positive economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-19_01_B5203; source_row=28356 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The submitted articles discuss the Petitioner's research findings rather than the Petitioner himself; he is only briefly mentioned in some articles and not mentioned at all in others. Additionally, several articles lacked the required author attribution, and none were accompanied by supporting evidence establishing they were published in professional or major trade publications or other major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The submitted articles discuss the Petitioner's research findings rather than the Petitioner himself; he is only briefly mentioned in some articles and not mentioned at all in others. Additionally, several articles lacked the required author attribution, and none were accompanied by supporting evidence establishing they were published in professional or major trade publications or other major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-19_01_B2203; source_row=28352 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Chemistry / Chemical Engineering40 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
Expert letters attested to the novelty of the Petitioner's work but lacked specific examples demonstrating major significance or demonstrable widespread impact. Citation counts and patent applications show originality but not major significance. Commercial interest is potential and prospective rather than already-realized impact.…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Expert letters attested to the novelty of the Petitioner's work but lacked specific examples demonstrating major significance or demonstrable widespread impact. Citation counts and patent applications show originality but not major significance. Commercial interest is potential and prospective rather than already-realized impact. Media coverage was limited and did not demonstrate widespread interest consistent with major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-19_01_B2203; source_row=28353 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner's sales and marketing activities lack sufficient evidence of projected U.S. economic impact or job creation to demonstrate national importance. On motion, the petitioner offered only conclusory assertions without new evidence or legal authority showing error.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's sales and marketing activities lack sufficient evidence of projected U.S. economic impact or job creation to demonstrate national importance. On motion, the petitioner offered only conclusory assertions without new evidence or legal authority showing error.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-19_02_B5203; source_row=28361 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner referenced a previously submitted transcript showing only 5 credit hours at a U.S. college, which does not demonstrate a U.S. baccalaureate degree or its foreign equivalent. No new evidence was submitted on motion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner referenced a previously submitted transcript showing only 5 credit hours at a U.S. college, which does not demonstrate a U.S. baccalaureate degree or its foreign equivalent. No new evidence was submitted on motion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-19_02_B5203; source_row=28359 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Ten years full-time experience (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(B))
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed with the Director, noting that the Petitioner did not identify any specific erroneous conclusion of law or fact in the Director's decision and that the letter does not provide probative evidence of ten years of full-time experience in the occupation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director, noting that the Petitioner did not identify any specific erroneous conclusion of law or fact in the Director's decision and that the letter does not provide probative evidence of ten years of full-time experience in the occupation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-19_03_B5203; source_row=28365 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Official academic record (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A))
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO declined to consider screenshots first submitted on appeal under Matter of Soriano. The Petitioner did not show the Diploma and Certificate constituted official academic records or that the granting entities qualify as institutions of learning.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to consider screenshots first submitted on appeal under Matter of Soriano. The Petitioner did not show the Diploma and Certificate constituted official academic records or that the granting entities qualify as institutions of learning.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-19_03_B5203; source_row=28364 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c