Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
high salary or remuneration (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(D))
Why AAO was not persuaded
Brazilian income figures do not align with the cited consultant-salary benchmark, and consultant remuneration is of questionable relevance to operating his own retail shops.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Brazilian income figures do not align with the cited consultant-salary benchmark, and consultant remuneration is of questionable relevance to operating his own retail shops.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-05_02_B5203; source_row=28263 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner was not qualified to practice dentistry in the United States at the time of filing, had no employer interest at filing, and improperly expanded his proposed endeavor post-filing to include lower-level positions such as dental assistant. Post-filing evidence and material amendments to the petition cannot cure the deficiencies at the time of filing.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner was not qualified to practice dentistry in the United States at the time of filing, had no employer interest at filing, and improperly expanded his proposed endeavor post-filing to include lower-level positions such as dental assistant. Post-filing evidence and material amendments to the petition cannot cure the deficiencies at the time of filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-05_01_B5203; source_row=28258 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed the criterion was met, finding the 2009 ABS-CBN article was about the Petitioner, going into detail about his career and work as a writer, and that ABS-CBN is a leading media organization in the Philippines.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the criterion was met, finding the 2009 ABS-CBN article was about the Petitioner, going into detail about his career and work as a writer, and that ABS-CBN is a leading media organization in the Philippines.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-04_01_B2203; source_row=28253 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed the Petitioner met this criterion based on receipt of writing competition awards, including evidence that his awards were noted as among 'the most prestigious' in broader media including ABS-CBN.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the Petitioner met this criterion based on receipt of writing competition awards, including evidence that his awards were noted as among 'the most prestigious' in broader media including ABS-CBN.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-04_01_B2203; source_row=28252 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO withdrew the Director's determination, holding that the plain language of the criterion only requires evidence of judging, and that final-merits-type standards (sustained acclaim, top of field) belong to step two, not the initial evidentiary criteria step.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's determination, holding that the plain language of the criterion only requires evidence of judging, and that final-merits-type standards (sustained acclaim, top of field) belong to step two, not the initial evidentiary criteria step.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-04_01_B2203; source_row=28254 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Official academic record showing advanced degree or foreign equivalent
Why AAO was not persuaded
The credential evaluator's conclusion was rejected because the specialization certificate reflected a lato-sensu program (leading to a professional certificate, not a graduate degree), the evaluator provided no comparative analysis of the coursework to a U.S. master's program, and the evaluation's credibility was undermined by lack of supporting analysis.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The credential evaluator's conclusion was rejected because the specialization certificate reflected a lato-sensu program (leading to a professional certificate, not a graduate degree), the evaluator provided no comparative analysis of the coursework to a U.S. master's program, and the evaluation's credibility was undermined by lack of supporting analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-03_02_B5203; source_row=28247 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in the specialty
Why AAO was not persuaded
The partner letter lacked specificity regarding job titles, duties, and dates of employment for positions held beyond 'partner,' making it insufficient to establish five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience. The professional certificates were also insufficient, as one predated the bachelor's degree and the other documented only a 35-hour course.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The partner letter lacked specificity regarding job titles, duties, and dates of employment for positions held beyond 'partner,' making it insufficient to establish five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience. The professional certificates were also insufficient, as one predated the bachelor's degree and the other documented only a 35-hour course.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-03_02_B5203; source_row=28248 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c