Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 11071–11080
EB-1AEB-1A · Major awardReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherBachelor’s
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Major award
One-time major internationally recognized award (Paralympic gold medals)
What the decision said
AAO declined to resolve the one-time achievement question on its merits, instead finding the Director's reliance on a non-precedent 2006 decision legally improper. AAO remanded for the Director to properly evaluate all evidence with due consideration of the Petitioner's arguments.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to resolve the one-time achievement question on its merits, instead finding the Director's reliance on a non-precedent 2006 decision legally improper. AAO remanded for the Director to properly evaluate all evidence with due consideration of the Petitioner's arguments.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-03_01_B2203; source_row=28232 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letters did not demonstrate that the Petitioner received recognition for achievements and significant contributions by peers, governmental entities, or professional or business organizations, and the Petitioner did not contest the Director's finding on appeal.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The letters did not demonstrate that the Petitioner received recognition for achievements and significant contributions by peers, governmental entities, or professional or business organizations, and the Petitioner did not contest the Director's finding on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-03_02_B5203; source_row=28246 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Ten years of full-time experience in the occupation
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the client letters did not satisfy the plain language of the criterion (requiring letters from employers), and the partner letter did not establish full-time software development work or specify how the Petitioner divided his time among various responsibilities.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the client letters did not satisfy the plain language of the criterion (requiring letters from employers), and the partner letter did not establish full-time software development work or specify how the Petitioner divided his time among various responsibilities.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-03_02_B5203; source_row=28242 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concurred with the Director and additionally noted that the salary comparison documents lacked certified English translations, making it impossible to meaningfully evaluate the translated content.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO concurred with the Director and additionally noted that the salary comparison documents lacked certified English translations, making it impossible to meaningfully evaluate the translated content.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-03_02_B5203; source_row=28244 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Civil / Structural Engineering13 papers
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement
Why the evidence was persuasive
The AAO found that the Petitioner's research has the potential to provide widespread benefits to the United States in generating energy, mitigating floods, and reducing socioeconomic losses, and that his track record of success means his contributions would benefit the United States even assuming the availability of other qualified U.S. workers.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the Petitioner's research has the potential to provide widespread benefits to the United States in generating energy, mitigating floods, and reducing socioeconomic losses, and that his track record of success means his contributions would benefit the United States even assuming the availability of other qualified U.S. workers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-03_01_B5203; source_row=28240 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Civil / Structural Engineering13 papers
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
The AAO found that the evidence, including World Bank and DOE reports, USGS data, and expert letters, establishes the substantial merit and national importance of the Petitioner's proposed research in hydrological modeling and water resource management.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the evidence, including World Bank and DOE reports, USGS data, and expert letters, establishes the substantial merit and national importance of the Petitioner's proposed research in hydrological modeling and water resource management.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-03_01_B5203; source_row=28238 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Civil / Structural Engineering13 papers
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why the evidence was persuasive
The AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that the Petitioner's education, published work and its influence on the field, progress in advancing hydrological modeling, and government interest and funding position him well to advance his proposed research.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that the Petitioner's education, published work and its influence on the field, progress in advancing hydrological modeling, and government interest and funding position him well to advance his proposed research.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-03_01_B5203; source_row=28239 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c