Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 11091–11100
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's statements were broad and general, failing to identify a specific proposed endeavor. Arguments about neurosurgeon shortages do not establish national importance under Dhanasar, as workforce shortages are addressed through the labor certification process.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's statements were broad and general, failing to identify a specific proposed endeavor. Arguments about neurosurgeon shortages do not establish national importance under Dhanasar, as workforce shortages are addressed through the labor certification process. The Petitioner's references to his past research record address prong two rather than prong one, and he did not differentiate his proposed endeavor from his past work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-29_01_B5203; source_row=28218 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer and labor certification
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to reach prong three because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first prong, making further analysis serve no meaningful purpose.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach prong three because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first prong, making further analysis serve no meaningful purpose.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-29_01_B5203; source_row=28220 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to reach prong two because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first prong, making further analysis serve no meaningful purpose.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach prong two because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first prong, making further analysis serve no meaningful purpose.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-29_01_B5203; source_row=28219 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO concluded the Petitioner conflated the collective importance of nurse practitioners with the national importance of her individual endeavor. Her speculative claims about job creation, conference attendance (which was attendance only, not presentations, often for licensure CE), and analogies to physician/Schedule A provisions did not demonstrate broader impact beyond her local patient care.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the Petitioner conflated the collective importance of nurse practitioners with the national importance of her individual endeavor. Her speculative claims about job creation, conference attendance (which was attendance only, not presentations, often for licensure CE), and analogies to physician/Schedule A provisions did not demonstrate broader impact beyond her local patient care.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-28_01_B5203; source_row=28207 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner's descriptions are generic and largely taken from an O*NET job description; assertions about benefits to employers, Brazil trade, and innovations are vague, unsupported, and tied to post-filing developments. The collective impact of supply chain management does not impute national importance to one manager's work.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's descriptions are generic and largely taken from an O*NET job description; assertions about benefits to employers, Brazil trade, and innovations are vague, unsupported, and tied to post-filing developments. The collective impact of supply chain management does not impute national importance to one manager's work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-28_02_B5203; source_row=28212 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that while the record supports substantial merit for software development work, the Petitioner did not show his proposed endeavor's prospective impact rises to national importance. His work would not extend beyond his employer and its IT users to impact the field or U.S. higher education more broadly, and he showed no significant potential to employ U.S.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the record supports substantial merit for software development work, the Petitioner did not show his proposed endeavor's prospective impact rises to national importance. His work would not extend beyond his employer and its IT users to impact the field or U.S. higher education more broadly, and he showed no significant potential to employ U.S. workers or generate substantial positive economic effects nationally.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-28_03_B5203; source_row=28215 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Because the Petitioner entered his accounting occupation before earning a baccalaureate, the occupation is not a profession; in addition, his post-baccalaureate experience falls short of the required five years.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Because the Petitioner entered his accounting occupation before earning a baccalaureate, the occupation is not a profession; in addition, his post-baccalaureate experience falls short of the required five years.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-28_02_B5203; source_row=28210 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c