Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 11141–11150

NIWexceptional ability otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Chemistry / Chemical Engineering

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

License or certification

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner submitted no evidence of a license to practice the occupation.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner submitted no evidence of a license to practice the occupation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-20_08_B5203; source_row=28154
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Chemistry / Chemical Engineering

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

Ten years of full-time experience

Why the evidence was persuasive

Documentation establishes employment in the engineering field since 2004, and a 2016 award letter recognized ten years of service. Though full-time status was not explicit, by preponderance the criterion was satisfied.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Documentation establishes employment in the engineering field since 2004, and a 2016 award letter recognized ten years of service. Though full-time status was not explicit, by preponderance the criterion was satisfied.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-20_08_B5203; source_row=28153
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Chemistry / Chemical Engineering

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

Official academic record (degree/diploma)

Why the evidence was persuasive

The record shows the petitioner earned a bachelor of chemical engineering degree from a Nigerian university in 2000, corroborated by transcripts.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The record shows the petitioner earned a bachelor of chemical engineering degree from a Nigerian university in 2000, corroborated by transcripts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-20_08_B5203; source_row=28152
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Chemistry / Chemical Engineering

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

Advanced degree or equivalent qualification

Why AAO was not persuaded

The equivalency evaluation was unsigned, did not reference the petitioner's transcripts among its source materials, and lacked any analysis of the petitioner's academic record. The employment evidence was not in the required format under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1), did not describe duties or employment dates, and failed to establish the progressive nature of the work.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The equivalency evaluation was unsigned, did not reference the petitioner's transcripts among its source materials, and lacked any analysis of the petitioner's academic record. The employment evidence was not in the required format under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1), did not describe duties or employment dates, and failed to establish the progressive nature of the work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-20_08_B5203; source_row=28151
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Chemistry / Chemical Engineering

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

High salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner submitted salary evidence but provided no comparative data showing his compensation exceeds that of other chemical engineers in the same geographic area and industry.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner submitted salary evidence but provided no comparative data showing his compensation exceeds that of other chemical engineers in the same geographic area and industry.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-20_08_B5203; source_row=28155
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to waive job offer and labor certification

What the decision said

AAO declined to reach prong 3 because prong 1 was dispositive.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach prong 3 because prong 1 was dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-20_06_B5203; source_row=28147
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO declined to consider the Petitioner's post-filing employment positions because eligibility must be established at the time of filing, and declined to consider a new reference letter not submitted in response to the RFE. AAO found the Petitioner did not address the Director's specific findings or identify erroneous conclusions of law.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to consider the Petitioner's post-filing employment positions because eligibility must be established at the time of filing, and declined to consider a new reference letter not submitted in response to the RFE. AAO found the Petitioner did not address the Director's specific findings or identify erroneous conclusions of law.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-20_01_B5203; source_row=28130
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement

What the decision said

AAO declined to reach prong 3 because failure on prong 2 was dispositive of NIW eligibility.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach prong 3 because failure on prong 2 was dispositive of NIW eligibility.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-20_01_B5203; source_row=28131
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agrees with the Director that the record supports a finding that the proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agrees with the Director that the record supports a finding that the proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-20_01_B5203; source_row=28129
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Chemistry / Chemical Engineering

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement

What the decision said

AAO did not separately analyze the third prong, having concluded that the failure on prongs one and two was dispositive of eligibility.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not separately analyze the third prong, having concluded that the failure on prongs one and two was dispositive of eligibility.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-20_07_B5203; source_row=28150
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment