Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 11171–11180
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concluded the record did not establish that the endeavor has broader implications within the field or significant potential to employ U.S. workers, and that the Petitioner's focus on the general field of software development did not address the specific endeavor's national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the record did not establish that the endeavor has broader implications within the field or significant potential to employ U.S. workers, and that the Petitioner's focus on the general field of software development did not address the specific endeavor's national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-14_07_B5203; source_row=28094 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
While the Petitioner showed her proposed employment as an economist has substantial merit, she failed to establish national importance because she did not specifically describe her proposed endeavor's prospective impact. She referenced past work and claimed models could be applied to U.S. welfare programs, but did not describe the specific model or how it would have broader implications.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
While the Petitioner showed her proposed employment as an economist has substantial merit, she failed to establish national importance because she did not specifically describe her proposed endeavor's prospective impact. She referenced past work and claimed models could be applied to U.S. welfare programs, but did not describe the specific model or how it would have broader implications. Similarly, her proposal to expand understanding of a foreign economy lacked evidence of national importance or a detailed description of future intentions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-14_03_B5203; source_row=28079 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the final merits standard was not met. The Petitioner's leading roles lacked descriptions of specific achievements; his published articles did not set him apart from co-authors or establish prestige of publications; his media appearances were largely geographically limited; his remuneration showed high pay only for 2018–2019 without sustained evidence; and his organizational service did not demonstrate acclaim in…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the final merits standard was not met. The Petitioner's leading roles lacked descriptions of specific achievements; his published articles did not set him apart from co-authors or establish prestige of publications; his media appearances were largely geographically limited; his remuneration showed high pay only for 2018–2019 without sustained evidence; and his organizational service did not demonstrate acclaim in the international tax community.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-14_03_B2203; source_row=28078 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination — sustained acclaim and very top of field
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO's aggregate review found minimal documentary support for sustained acclaim: notable absence of commercial-success evidence (criterion x) for a performing artist, sparse documentation of recordings/albums, low YouTube view counts without comparators, and uncorroborated assertions in support letters.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO's aggregate review found minimal documentary support for sustained acclaim: notable absence of commercial-success evidence (criterion x) for a performing artist, sparse documentation of recordings/albums, low YouTube view counts without comparators, and uncorroborated assertions in support letters.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-14_02_B2203; source_row=28071 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO agreed substantial merit was shown but found the recommendation letters focused retrospectively on past achievements, contained unsupported claims and misattributions, and did not show how the specific prospective endeavor would have national or global implications or substantial positive economic effects.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed substantial merit was shown but found the recommendation letters focused retrospectively on past achievements, contained unsupported claims and misattributions, and did not show how the specific prospective endeavor would have national or global implications or substantial positive economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-14_08_B5203; source_row=28097 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability
Why AAO was not persuaded
The tax return itemized the cited amounts as assets held (shares of stock and corporate interest), not income earned, with stock value held constant year-over-year and the corporate interest reflecting a net-zero return on a capital contribution.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The tax return itemized the cited amounts as assets held (shares of stock and corporate interest), not income earned, with stock value held constant year-over-year and the corporate interest reflecting a net-zero return on a capital contribution. Petitioner's actual declared income of R$49,828.06 was below the junior-level salary for a small organization in his own salary survey, not nearly ten times the highest master's-level salary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-14_05_B5203; source_row=28088 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The 2006 diploma does not indicate the corresponding academic level and neither the 2000 nor 2006 diploma is supported by a qualifying independent credentials evaluation. The opinion letter author had a prior working relationship with the Petitioner and thus lacks independence. The record fails to establish equivalency to a U.S. advanced degree.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The 2006 diploma does not indicate the corresponding academic level and neither the 2000 nor 2006 diploma is supported by a qualifying independent credentials evaluation. The opinion letter author had a prior working relationship with the Petitioner and thus lacks independence. The record fails to establish equivalency to a U.S. advanced degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-14_02_B5203; source_row=28073 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concludes the Petitioner did not show how working as a marketing manager would have broader implications beyond her immediate employer(s), and that focus on the importance of marketing in general does not address the specific endeavor.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO concludes the Petitioner did not show how working as a marketing manager would have broader implications beyond her immediate employer(s), and that focus on the importance of marketing in general does not address the specific endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-14_06_B5203; source_row=28091 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c