Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 11211–11220
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot established
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical22 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications
Why AAO was not persuaded
The public announcement identified on appeal lacked the required date and author, and the Petitioner did not explain how a competition results posting on an organization's website constituted a professional or major trade publication or other major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The public announcement identified on appeal lacked the required date and author, and the Petitioner did not explain how a competition results posting on an organization's website constituted a professional or major trade publication or other major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-08_02_B2203; source_row=28032 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Student awards and research grants were abandoned on appeal. The sole travel award (2013 Young Researcher Award) did not demonstrate excellence in the field because eligibility criteria were based on age, residency, and basic publication requirements rather than excellence, and advisory letters did not explain how it was nationally or internationally recognized for excellence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Student awards and research grants were abandoned on appeal. The sole travel award (2013 Young Researcher Award) did not demonstrate excellence in the field because eligibility criteria were based on age, residency, and basic publication requirements rather than excellence, and advisory letters did not explain how it was nationally or internationally recognized for excellence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-08_02_B2203; source_row=28030 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that the proposed endeavor has substantial merit but found that the Petitioner failed to establish national importance. The evidence showed only broad demand for financial managers generally and did not demonstrate that the Petitioner's specific work would extend beyond his immediate employer and clientele to impact his field or the national economy more broadly, nor did it show significant potential to employ U.S.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the proposed endeavor has substantial merit but found that the Petitioner failed to establish national importance. The evidence showed only broad demand for financial managers generally and did not demonstrate that the Petitioner's specific work would extend beyond his immediate employer and clientele to impact his field or the national economy more broadly, nor did it show significant potential to employ U.S. workers or produce substantial positive economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-08_01_B5203; source_row=28027 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Substantial merit is established, but the specific endeavor of providing audiology/speech pathology services does not have prospective impact extending beyond individual patients, lacks evidence of substantial positive economic effects, and worker shortages are addressed through the labor certification process.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
Substantial merit is established, but the specific endeavor of providing audiology/speech pathology services does not have prospective impact extending beyond individual patients, lacks evidence of substantial positive economic effects, and worker shortages are addressed through the labor certification process.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-08_03_B5203; source_row=28041 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The record lacks a description of the Petitioner's duties to confirm IT Project Manager is the proper comparator, and not all IT managerial occupations fall under 'Computer Occupations, All Other.' His 2013 earnings fell between the 75th and 90th percentiles statewide, and his 2016 salary, while above-average, was not shown to be 'high.'
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record lacks a description of the Petitioner's duties to confirm IT Project Manager is the proper comparator, and not all IT managerial occupations fall under 'Computer Occupations, All Other.' His 2013 earnings fell between the 75th and 90th percentiles statewide, and his 2016 salary, while above-average, was not shown to be 'high.'
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-08_01_B2203; source_row=28025 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concluded that IEEE's 'significant performance' standard, which can be satisfied through job responsibilities such as team lead, project manager, or faculty positions resulting in publications, does not equate to 'outstanding achievements,' and that Senior Member panels (composed of other Senior Members) do not necessarily consist of recognized national or international experts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded that IEEE's 'significant performance' standard, which can be satisfied through job responsibilities such as team lead, project manager, or faculty positions resulting in publications, does not equate to 'outstanding achievements,' and that Senior Member panels (composed of other Senior Members) do not necessarily consist of recognized national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-08_01_B2203; source_row=28024 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical22 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria. In an advisory capacity, AAO noted the record did not support the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria. In an advisory capacity, AAO noted the record did not support the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-08_02_B2203; source_row=28037 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c