Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 11221–11230
NIWEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
Final merits determination for exceptional ability
What the decision said
Because the petitioner met only two of the six criteria (not the required three), AAO determined a final merits determination was not required. AAO nonetheless noted agreement with the director's conclusion that the record does not establish experience beyond that ordinarily encountered.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Because the petitioner met only two of the six criteria (not the required three), AAO determined a final merits determination was not required. AAO nonetheless noted agreement with the director's conclusion that the record does not establish experience beyond that ordinarily encountered.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-08_04_B5203; source_row=28052 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(D))
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner did not contest this finding on appeal, so AAO affirmed the Director's conclusion that Polish salary statistics were irrelevant and U.S. salary comparisons and corroborating tax documents were absent.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner did not contest this finding on appeal, so AAO affirmed the Director's conclusion that Polish salary statistics were irrelevant and U.S. salary comparisons and corroborating tax documents were absent.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-08_04_B5203; source_row=28049 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Membership in professional associations (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(E))
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed that the petitioner's membership in the National Association of Realtors and a local Realtors association is relevant and satisfies this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the petitioner's membership in the National Association of Realtors and a local Realtors association is relevant and satisfies this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-08_04_B5203; source_row=28050 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Official academic record showing degree relating to area of exceptional ability (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A))
Why AAO was not persuaded
For the same reasons as under the advanced degree analysis, AAO found the academic record evidence insufficiently credible and detailed to meet this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
For the same reasons as under the advanced degree analysis, AAO found the academic record evidence insufficiently credible and detailed to meet this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-08_04_B5203; source_row=28046 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Five years of progressively responsible post-baccalaureate experience
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed with and expanded on the Director's concerns, noting additional contradictions between the initial employment letters, the new employment letters, and the petitioner's résumé (e.g., conflicting titles and dates). The letters lacked independent corroboration and were insufficiently detailed to establish the progressive nature of the work.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with and expanded on the Director's concerns, noting additional contradictions between the initial employment letters, the new employment letters, and the petitioner's résumé (e.g., conflicting titles and dates). The letters lacked independent corroboration and were insufficiently detailed to establish the progressive nature of the work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-08_04_B5203; source_row=28045 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Advanced degree or foreign equivalent academic record
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Polish academic documents lacked official character, contained spelling errors, were in English without original Polish copies, were unsigned and undated in part, and did not link the petitioner to the courses. The Swedish evidence was only a certificate of participation without confirmation of graduation. The credential evaluations offered no independent analysis and were given little weight.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Polish academic documents lacked official character, contained spelling errors, were in English without original Polish copies, were unsigned and undated in part, and did not link the petitioner to the courses. The Swedish evidence was only a certificate of participation without confirmation of graduation. The credential evaluations offered no independent analysis and were given little weight.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-08_04_B5203; source_row=28044 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(F))
Why AAO was not persuaded
Petitioner did not contest this criterion on appeal. On de novo review, AAO found the letters described good character, skill, and internal accomplishments but did not demonstrate impact on the field or industry as a whole. The claim of international renown appeared to reflect only work in multiple countries rather than a world-renowned reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Petitioner did not contest this criterion on appeal. On de novo review, AAO found the letters described good character, skill, and internal accomplishments but did not demonstrate impact on the field or industry as a whole. The claim of international renown appeared to reflect only work in multiple countries rather than a world-renowned reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-08_04_B5203; source_row=28051 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Civil / Structural EngineeringPhD20 papers
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO concludes the proposed endeavor has substantial merit (advancing scientific knowledge on food-waste treatment and water pollution) and national importance based on potential prospective impact, including collaboration with USDA's Agricultural Research Service and application to Clean Water Act goals.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO concludes the proposed endeavor has substantial merit (advancing scientific knowledge on food-waste treatment and water pollution) and national importance based on potential prospective impact, including collaboration with USDA's Agricultural Research Service and application to Clean Water Act goals.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-08_02_B5203; source_row=28038 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c