Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
The Director found, and AAO agreed, that the Petitioner's peer review of a manuscript for The Journal of Physical Chemistry satisfied the judging criterion.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The Director found, and AAO agreed, that the Petitioner's peer review of a manuscript for The Journal of Physical Chemistry satisfied the judging criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-25_02_B2203; source_row=27925 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with distinguished reputations
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach this criterion because the Petitioner could not satisfy the threshold requirement of three criteria regardless of the outcome on this prong.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach this criterion because the Petitioner could not satisfy the threshold requirement of three criteria regardless of the outcome on this prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-25_01_B2203; source_row=27911 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO confirmed that the Petitioner has been a designer for many years and has displayed her work in national and international competitions and performances, satisfying this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO confirmed that the Petitioner has been a designer for many years and has displayed her work in national and international competitions and performances, satisfying this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-25_01_B2203; source_row=27910 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found that the Petitioner's statements and evidence described broad public health goals and future job-seeking activities but failed to identify specific projects with prospective impact rising to the level of national importance.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the Petitioner's statements and evidence described broad public health goals and future job-seeking activities but failed to identify specific projects with prospective impact rising to the level of national importance. The expert letter relied on the vacated NYSDOT framework's language rather than Dhanasar's, and the Petitioner's arguments about COVID-19 urgency did not specify the capacity in which he would work or demonstrate national importance of particular projects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-24_04_B5203; source_row=27902 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that while the Petitioner's work as an entrepreneur has substantial merit, it did not rise to national importance. The Petitioner's business operations were limited in scope, he holds only a 10% share in one company, there was no showing of significant U.S.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the Petitioner's work as an entrepreneur has substantial merit, it did not rise to national importance. The Petitioner's business operations were limited in scope, he holds only a 10% share in one company, there was no showing of significant U.S. job creation or substantial positive economic effects at a national level, and the proposed endeavor would not broadly impact the field beyond his own companies and clientele.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-24_03_B5203; source_row=27899 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner raised this criterion for the first time on second motion; AAO noted this was improper and the claim was abandoned for not being raised on appeal. Even so, AAO evaluated the evidence and found it insufficient because the Petitioner provided no independent corroborative documentation establishing the value of non-salaried compensation, leaving the total compensation figure unresolved.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner raised this criterion for the first time on second motion; AAO noted this was improper and the claim was abandoned for not being raised on appeal. Even so, AAO evaluated the evidence and found it insufficient because the Petitioner provided no independent corroborative documentation establishing the value of non-salaried compensation, leaving the total compensation figure unresolved.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-24_01_B2203; source_row=27891 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner claimed a leading role but submitted no new evidence to corroborate the claim on second motion, relying instead on previously reviewed letters. AAO declined to address whether the organization had a distinguished reputation because the Petitioner had not shown she played a leading or critical role.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner claimed a leading role but submitted no new evidence to corroborate the claim on second motion, relying instead on previously reviewed letters. AAO declined to address whether the organization had a distinguished reputation because the Petitioner had not shown she played a leading or critical role.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-24_01_B2203; source_row=27890 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the credential evaluation insufficient because it did not demonstrate that the Petitioner's education alone meets 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(i)(A), and there was no evidence the evaluator reviewed employment letters to verify work history. The evaluator also relied only on the Petitioner's resume for work experience and did not resolve discrepancies between the degree description on the diploma versus the evaluation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the credential evaluation insufficient because it did not demonstrate that the Petitioner's education alone meets 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(i)(A), and there was no evidence the evaluator reviewed employment letters to verify work history. The evaluator also relied only on the Petitioner's resume for work experience and did not resolve discrepancies between the degree description on the diploma versus the evaluation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-24_02_B5203; source_row=27894 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c