Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 11381–11390
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in major media
Why the evidence was persuasive
Director found criterion met; AAO did not disturb this finding but criticized the Director's failure to weigh this evidence in the final merits determination.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Director found criterion met; AAO did not disturb this finding but criticized the Director's failure to weigh this evidence in the final merits determination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-16_01_B2203; source_row=27842 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
PhysicsMaster’s
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO notes the Director considered the Petitioner's credentials and history under prong two, and that those credentials are not in dispute, but does not make a separate prong-two finding because prong one is dispositive.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO notes the Director considered the Petitioner's credentials and history under prong two, and that those credentials are not in dispute, but does not make a separate prong-two finding because prong one is dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-16_03_B5203; source_row=27853 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The flight school's job creation (no more than six employees at a time, reliance on contractors) and capital investment ($1,000,000, ~10 jobs) did not rise above EB-5 thresholds in significance. Participation in a national training certification program did not show national importance at the individual-company level. Claims about unique airplane-and-helicopter training were uncorroborated.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The flight school's job creation (no more than six employees at a time, reliance on contractors) and capital investment ($1,000,000, ~10 jobs) did not rise above EB-5 thresholds in significance. Participation in a national training certification program did not show national importance at the individual-company level. Claims about unique airplane-and-helicopter training were uncorroborated. The proposed software would give the company a competitive advantage rather than a nationally important benefit. The online academy lacked any supporting evidence. Training largely foreign students did not address U.S. pilot shortages. New claims raised for the first time on appeal could not establish eligibility as of the filing date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-15_02_B5203; source_row=27835 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Materials SciencePhD
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to waive job offer and labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the Petitioner did not satisfy the third prong. The urgency argument was unpersuasive because background relevance to energy efficiency does not show that standard job offer processes would impose unacceptable delays or that the Petitioner's work would have a substantial (rather than incremental) near-term impact.…
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the Petitioner did not satisfy the third prong. The urgency argument was unpersuasive because background relevance to energy efficiency does not show that standard job offer processes would impose unacceptable delays or that the Petitioner's work would have a substantial (rather than incremental) near-term impact. The specialization argument failed because metallurgical engineering is not as specialized as the field in Dhanasar. Citation evidence alone did not establish that waiving the job offer requirement would be beneficial on balance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-15_03_B5203; source_row=27840 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's reliance on broad industry economic benefits does not address the specific prospective impact of his own proposed work. He failed to show that his work would extend beyond his employer(s)/clients or have broader implications in the supply chain or logistics fields, or that it would have significant potential to employ U.S. workers or offer substantial positive economic effects for the nation.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's reliance on broad industry economic benefits does not address the specific prospective impact of his own proposed work. He failed to show that his work would extend beyond his employer(s)/clients or have broader implications in the supply chain or logistics fields, or that it would have significant potential to employ U.S. workers or offer substantial positive economic effects for the nation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-15_01_B5203; source_row=27832 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Materials SciencePhD
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO disagreed with the Director's finding that national importance was not established. AAO found the Director improperly conflated the proposed endeavor with the Petitioner's then-current employment and failed to consider evidence showing the Petitioner's research could improve fuel efficiency in countless vehicles and has aerospace applications, with findings disseminated through published articles.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director's finding that national importance was not established. AAO found the Director improperly conflated the proposed endeavor with the Petitioner's then-current employment and failed to consider evidence showing the Petitioner's research could improve fuel efficiency in countless vehicles and has aerospace applications, with findings disseminated through published articles.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-15_03_B5203; source_row=27838 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Materials SciencePhD
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied the second prong, having already given him credit for the hundreds of citations to his published work.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied the second prong, having already given him credit for the hundreds of citations to his published work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-15_03_B5203; source_row=27839 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed that the proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance. The teacher shortage alone does not elevate an individual teacher's work to national importance, and the record failed to show the Petitioner's proposed teaching would have wider implications in the fields of ESL, philosophy, or education beyond his particular school.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance. The teacher shortage alone does not elevate an individual teacher's work to national importance, and the record failed to show the Petitioner's proposed teaching would have wider implications in the fields of ESL, philosophy, or education beyond his particular school.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-14_01_B5203; source_row=27823 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that while the Petitioner's proposed work has substantial merit, she did not provide sufficient evidence of prospective national impact. Her statements reflected intention to provide valuable consulting services but did not demonstrate that the impact of her work would rise to national importance or generate substantial positive economic effects beyond her own company and clients.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the Petitioner's proposed work has substantial merit, she did not provide sufficient evidence of prospective national impact. Her statements reflected intention to provide valuable consulting services but did not demonstrate that the impact of her work would rise to national importance or generate substantial positive economic effects beyond her own company and clients.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-14_03_B5203; source_row=27829 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c