Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 11421–11430

NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Finance

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to waive job offer/labor certification

What the decision said

AAO expressly reserved its opinion on the third prong because the failure of the first prong was dispositive.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO expressly reserved its opinion on the third prong because the failure of the first prong was dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-09_02_B5203; source_row=27783
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Finance

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

AAO expressly reserved its opinion on the second prong because the failure of the first prong was dispositive.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO expressly reserved its opinion on the second prong because the failure of the first prong was dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-09_02_B5203; source_row=27782
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

The AAO explicitly reserved opinion on the second prong because the first prong was not satisfied.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
The AAO explicitly reserved opinion on the second prong because the first prong was not satisfied.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-09_07_B5203; source_row=27797
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO found that the proposed endeavor benefits the Petitioner's employer and clients but lacks broader national implications. The Petitioner provided no evidence showing how his specific endeavor would impact the economy or the field beyond his immediate employer and clients, and his general assertions about business productivity and economic activity do not address the specific endeavor's broader implications as require…

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the proposed endeavor benefits the Petitioner's employer and clients but lacks broader national implications. The Petitioner provided no evidence showing how his specific endeavor would impact the economy or the field beyond his immediate employer and clients, and his general assertions about business productivity and economic activity do not address the specific endeavor's broader implications as required by Dhanasar.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-09_07_B5203; source_row=27796
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement

What the decision said

The AAO explicitly reserved opinion on the third prong because the first prong was not satisfied.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
The AAO explicitly reserved opinion on the third prong because the first prong was not satisfied.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-09_07_B5203; source_row=27798
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Materials Science

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

AAO explicitly reserved its opinion on the second prong because the failure of the first prong was dispositive.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly reserved its opinion on the second prong because the failure of the first prong was dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-09_11_B5203; source_row=27812
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Materials Science

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to waive job offer and labor certification

What the decision said

AAO explicitly reserved its opinion on the third prong because the failure of the first prong was dispositive.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly reserved its opinion on the third prong because the failure of the first prong was dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-09_11_B5203; source_row=27813
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO concluded the Petitioner did not show the endeavor has broader implications beyond the Petitioner's own business, did not provide salient details about U.S. worker employment, did not establish specific anticipated positive economic effects, and did not show the effects would be in an economically depressed area.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the Petitioner did not show the endeavor has broader implications beyond the Petitioner's own business, did not provide salient details about U.S. worker employment, did not establish specific anticipated positive economic effects, and did not show the effects would be in an economically depressed area.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-09_10_B5203; source_row=27808
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that while the Petitioner's work as a nutritionist has substantial merit, the record did not demonstrate that the prospective impact of her proposed endeavor rises to national importance. Her services would not extend sufficiently beyond her individual customers to broadly impact the nutrition/healthcare field or U.S. economy, and she presented no evidence of significant potential to employ U.S.…

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the Petitioner's work as a nutritionist has substantial merit, the record did not demonstrate that the prospective impact of her proposed endeavor rises to national importance. Her services would not extend sufficiently beyond her individual customers to broadly impact the nutrition/healthcare field or U.S. economy, and she presented no evidence of significant potential to employ U.S. workers or generate substantial positive economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-08_06_B5203; source_row=27777
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established

Case facts

Mechanical / Manufacturing Engineering

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed with the Director that substantial merit was shown, but found that the Petitioner had not demonstrated national importance. The proposed endeavor lacked evidence of prospective impact beyond his potential employers on the broader U.S. auto industry or economy, and did not show significant potential to employ U.S. workers or produce substantial positive economic effects.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that substantial merit was shown, but found that the Petitioner had not demonstrated national importance. The proposed endeavor lacked evidence of prospective impact beyond his potential employers on the broader U.S. auto industry or economy, and did not show significant potential to employ U.S. workers or produce substantial positive economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-08_03_B5203; source_row=27768
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment