Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
Most awards were issued to the Petitioner's company rather than to him personally. The awards from the regional Development Zone are limited to companies in that zone and not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized. The single award the Petitioner personally received (a Henan Daily honor) was provincial in scope.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Most awards were issued to the Petitioner's company rather than to him personally. The awards from the regional Development Zone are limited to companies in that zone and not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized. The single award the Petitioner personally received (a Henan Daily honor) was provincial in scope.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-08_02_B2203; source_row=27756 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or other significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
Petitioner did not provide comparative salary or total remuneration data for executives in China; reliance on U.S. CareerOneStop figures is not an appropriate comparison for someone working in China.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Petitioner did not provide comparative salary or total remuneration data for executives in China; reliance on U.S. CareerOneStop figures is not an appropriate comparison for someone working in China.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-08_02_B2203; source_row=27761 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
memberships in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
Most associations admit company members rather than individuals, and the certifications submitted do not detail membership requirements or selection processes for elected leadership positions, nor establish that outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts are an essential condition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Most associations admit company members rather than individuals, and the certifications submitted do not detail membership requirements or selection processes for elected leadership positions, nor establish that outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts are an essential condition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-08_02_B2203; source_row=27757 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the individual in major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
Petitioner did not provide context comparing Henan Daily's circulation to peer Chinese publications; comparisons to U.S. newspapers are not relevant. Even if it were major media, the articles are about the company and only briefly mention the Petitioner.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Petitioner did not provide context comparing Henan Daily's circulation to peer Chinese publications; comparisons to U.S. newspapers are not relevant. Even if it were major media, the articles are about the company and only briefly mention the Petitioner.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-08_02_B2203; source_row=27758 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the proposed endeavor showed substantial merit but not national importance. Simply working for a federally funded program is insufficient; the record does not show her work would impact the nutrition field broadly, contains no original innovations, and offers no evidence of economic impact or job creation at the national level.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the proposed endeavor showed substantial merit but not national importance. Simply working for a federally funded program is insufficient; the record does not show her work would impact the nutrition field broadly, contains no original innovations, and offers no evidence of economic impact or job creation at the national level. A nutritionist shortage also does not render the endeavor nationally important under Dhanasar.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-08_01_B5203; source_row=27753 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the expert letters contained lengthy passages copied verbatim from the Beneficiary's own published articles without attribution, rendering them unreliable as independent evaluations. The letters described the Beneficiary's work without explaining why or how those contributions were of major significance. Citation evidence lacked comparative data to establish significance relative to others in the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the expert letters contained lengthy passages copied verbatim from the Beneficiary's own published articles without attribution, rendering them unreliable as independent evaluations. The letters described the Beneficiary's work without explaining why or how those contributions were of major significance. Citation evidence lacked comparative data to establish significance relative to others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-08_01_B2203; source_row=27749 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the laboratory director's letter described the Beneficiary's projects but did not explain how his roles were critical at the organizational level. Evidence of the university's general reputation did not establish the specific lab's distinguished reputation. Regarding the current employer, no organizational chart was provided and the division website was promotional rather than objective evidence of reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the laboratory director's letter described the Beneficiary's projects but did not explain how his roles were critical at the organizational level. Evidence of the university's general reputation did not establish the specific lab's distinguished reputation. Regarding the current employer, no organizational chart was provided and the division website was promotional rather than objective evidence of reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-08_01_B2203; source_row=27751 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Finance
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance. The evidence consisted of general industry information rather than specific evidence showing that the Petitioner's proposed work would have prospective impact at the national level, and the Petitioner conflated the national importance of the financial services field with the national importance of his specific proposed endeavor.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance. The evidence consisted of general industry information rather than specific evidence showing that the Petitioner's proposed work would have prospective impact at the national level, and the Petitioner conflated the national importance of the financial services field with the national importance of his specific proposed endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-08_04_B5203; source_row=27771 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the record shows substantial merit but not national importance. The Petitioner conflated the importance of the broader tax/trade industry with the national importance of his specific proposed endeavor. He failed to show credible revenue projections, demonstrated economic impact on any region, significant employment creation, or broader implications for the tax field or U.S.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the record shows substantial merit but not national importance. The Petitioner conflated the importance of the broader tax/trade industry with the national importance of his specific proposed endeavor. He failed to show credible revenue projections, demonstrated economic impact on any region, significant employment creation, or broader implications for the tax field or U.S. economy beyond his own potential customer base.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-08_05_B5203; source_row=27774 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-2 threshold eligibility (advanced degree or exceptional ability)
What the decision said
AAO noted the Director failed to analyze EB-2 eligibility and remanded for that determination to be made, flagging that the Petitioner's foreign degree evaluation may only show a baccalaureate equivalent, requiring five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted the Director failed to analyze EB-2 eligibility and remanded for that determination to be made, flagging that the Petitioner's foreign degree evaluation may only show a baccalaureate equivalent, requiring five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-08_02_B5203; source_row=27764 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c