Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 11471–11480

EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

original contributions of major significance

What the decision said

AAO reserved this issue because the Petitioner could not satisfy the minimum three criteria regardless of its outcome, making a ruling on this criterion unnecessary.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
AAO reserved this issue because the Petitioner could not satisfy the minimum three criteria regardless of its outcome, making a ruling on this criterion unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-07_02_B2203; source_row=27735
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to waive job offer requirement

What the decision said

AAO declined to reach the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the first two prongs, making further discussion of balancing factors unnecessary.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the first two prongs, making further discussion of balancing factors unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-07_05_B5203; source_row=27747
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / ManagementBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO agreed that the Petitioner is well-positioned to advance his proposed endeavor based on his past experience owning and operating a similar company and the interest of business partners and potential clients.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed that the Petitioner is well-positioned to advance his proposed endeavor based on his past experience owning and operating a similar company and the interest of business partners and potential clients.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-07_04_B5203; source_row=27743
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / ManagementBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to waive job offer and labor certification

What the decision said

Because the Petitioner failed to establish national importance under the first prong, the AAO declined to further analyze the third prong, finding that such discussion would serve no meaningful purpose.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
Because the Petitioner failed to establish national importance under the first prong, the AAO declined to further analyze the third prong, finding that such discussion would serve no meaningful purpose.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-07_04_B5203; source_row=27744
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / ManagementBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO found that the evidence did not establish significant potential to employ U.S. workers or other substantial positive economic effects. The joint venture was formed after filing and thus could not establish eligibility at time of filing; the business plan projections were internally inconsistent and unsupported; references to unique product features lacked evidence of broader industry implications.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the evidence did not establish significant potential to employ U.S. workers or other substantial positive economic effects. The joint venture was formed after filing and thus could not establish eligibility at time of filing; the business plan projections were internally inconsistent and unsupported; references to unique product features lacked evidence of broader industry implications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-07_04_B5203; source_row=27742
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to waive job offer requirement

What the decision said

AAO did not separately address the third prong, instead resolving the appeal against the Petitioner on the basis of the undefined proposed endeavor (prongs one and two).

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not separately address the third prong, instead resolving the appeal against the Petitioner on the basis of the undefined proposed endeavor (prongs one and two).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-07_03_B5203; source_row=29479
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

AAO declined to address prong 2 because the failure on prong 1 is dispositive.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to address prong 2 because the failure on prong 1 is dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-07_02_B5203; source_row=27737
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement

What the decision said

AAO declined to address prong 3 because the failure on prong 1 is dispositive.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to address prong 3 because the failure on prong 1 is dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-07_02_B5203; source_row=27738
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO concluded the totality of evidence does not show sustained national or international acclaim or that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of the field.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the totality of evidence does not show sustained national or international acclaim or that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-04_01_B2203; source_row=27723
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

awards

What the decision said

Petitioner did not contest the Director's adverse finding on this criterion on appeal, so AAO deemed the issue waived.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Petitioner did not contest the Director's adverse finding on this criterion on appeal, so AAO deemed the issue waived.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-04_01_B2203; source_row=27716
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment