Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Both the Director and AAO agreed the Petitioner satisfied the judging criterion. No further analysis was provided in the AAO decision for this criterion at step 1.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
Both the Director and AAO agreed the Petitioner satisfied the judging criterion. No further analysis was provided in the AAO decision for this criterion at step 1.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-28_01_B2203; source_row=27706 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Chemistry / Chemical EngineeringPhD32 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim. Scholarly articles and peer review are routine activities; citations are concentrated in three articles; her postdoctoral status suggests ongoing training; and expert letters do not establish a consensus of acclaim. No demand for her services commensurate with claimed reputation was shown.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim. Scholarly articles and peer review are routine activities; citations are concentrated in three articles; her postdoctoral status suggests ongoing training; and expert letters do not establish a consensus of acclaim. No demand for her services commensurate with claimed reputation was shown.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-28_01_B2203; source_row=27709 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Chemistry / Chemical EngineeringPhD32 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the Petitioner's co-authorship of highly cited articles and the adoption of her detection/measurement techniques by other researchers established original contributions of major significance, reversing the Director's finding.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's co-authorship of highly cited articles and the adoption of her detection/measurement techniques by other researchers established original contributions of major significance, reversing the Director's finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-28_01_B2203; source_row=27707 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
Substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's personal statement focused on past accomplishments rather than the prospective impact of his proposed endeavor. He failed to explain how his management activities with the identified nonprofit organizations would advance his stated goal of promoting Korean culture and diversity at a national level, and did not show that his proposed activities would have broader implications in the field of nonprofit manage…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's personal statement focused on past accomplishments rather than the prospective impact of his proposed endeavor. He failed to explain how his management activities with the identified nonprofit organizations would advance his stated goal of promoting Korean culture and diversity at a national level, and did not show that his proposed activities would have broader implications in the field of nonprofit management.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-27_02_B5203; source_row=27695 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the record in aggregate did not support a finding of sustained national or international acclaim, noting that competing at professional European levels does not automatically satisfy the standard, that the Petitioner's acclaim was not widely reported in major media, and that his coaching contributions were not sufficiently corroborated or established.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the record in aggregate did not support a finding of sustained national or international acclaim, noting that competing at professional European levels does not automatically satisfy the standard, that the Petitioner's acclaim was not widely reported in major media, and that his coaching contributions were not sufficiently corroborated or established.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-27_03_B2203; source_row=27705 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that volleyball referee duties involve enforcing rules rather than judging the performance of players, and therefore the Petitioner's service as a referee did not satisfy this criterion.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that volleyball referee duties involve enforcing rules rather than judging the performance of players, and therefore the Petitioner's service as a referee did not satisfy this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-27_03_B2203; source_row=27701 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed with the Director that none of the media outlets were established as professional or major trade publications or other major media, as the traffic metrics and marketing material were insufficient to show qualification.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that none of the media outlets were established as professional or major trade publications or other major media, as the traffic metrics and marketing material were insufficient to show qualification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-27_03_B2203; source_row=27700 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the federation president's letter did not identify specific benchmarks or explain how the selection criteria constituted outstanding achievements as judged by recognized experts, and was not corroborated by official rules or selection procedures.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the federation president's letter did not identify specific benchmarks or explain how the selection criteria constituted outstanding achievements as judged by recognized experts, and was not corroborated by official rules or selection procedures.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-27_03_B2203; source_row=27699 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c