Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 11611–11620
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach prong 3 because the failure on prong 2 is dispositive.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach prong 3 because the failure on prong 2 is dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-14_02_B5203; source_row=27579 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The record contains evidence that the Petitioner displayed her work performing at various artistic and musical venues, confirming that she meets the display criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record contains evidence that the Petitioner displayed her work performing at various artistic and musical venues, confirming that she meets the display criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-14_01_B2203; source_row=27571 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold criteria count, but noted in advisory terms that the record does not support sustained national or international acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold criteria count, but noted in advisory terms that the record does not support sustained national or international acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-14_01_B2203; source_row=27573 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO noted the Director omitted any determination on this criterion from the final decision despite having indicated in the RFE that it was satisfied, and remanded for a new decision including a determination on this criterion.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted the Director omitted any determination on this criterion from the final decision despite having indicated in the RFE that it was satisfied, and remanded for a new decision including a determination on this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-13_01_B2203; source_row=27563 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
What the decision said
AAO found the Director's analysis inadequate for failing to consider all the evidence and claims, and remanded for re-examination including accompanying explanatory letters.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's analysis inadequate for failing to consider all the evidence and claims, and remanded for re-examination including accompanying explanatory letters.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-13_01_B2203; source_row=27562 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Director's analysis of this criterion inadequate for failing to discuss the specific evidence, and remanded for re-examination including the Petitioner's accompanying letters.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's analysis of this criterion inadequate for failing to discuss the specific evidence, and remanded for re-examination including the Petitioner's accompanying letters.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-13_01_B2203; source_row=27561 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c