Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 11621–11630

NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO found the proposed endeavor was geographically and scopewise limited and lacked broader implications for employment, economic effects, or process improvements that would establish national importance.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found the proposed endeavor was geographically and scopewise limited and lacked broader implications for employment, economic effects, or process improvements that would establish national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-12_04_B5203; source_row=27554
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO concluded the endeavor has merit but not national importance: training already-employed surgeons does not significantly employ U.S. workers, plans for a diagnostic facility lack specifics, and benefits to individual patients address merit rather than national importance. The geographic focus on parts of Ohio and Florida lacks evidence of broader implications.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the endeavor has merit but not national importance: training already-employed surgeons does not significantly employ U.S. workers, plans for a diagnostic facility lack specifics, and benefits to individual patients address merit rather than national importance. The geographic focus on parts of Ohio and Florida lacks evidence of broader implications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-12_05_B5203; source_row=27557
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

advanced degree qualification

Why AAO was not persuaded

The record lacks a credentials evaluation from an academic credentials evaluation service to establish equivalency of the Petitioner's foreign degrees to U.S. degrees. Because this threshold question was not resolved, remand is required.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The record lacks a credentials evaluation from an academic credentials evaluation service to establish equivalency of the Petitioner's foreign degrees to U.S. degrees. Because this threshold question was not resolved, remand is required.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-12_02_B5203; source_row=27546
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherMaster’s

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

advanced degree qualification

Why AAO was not persuaded

The certifications in the record do not indicate the foreign degrees are equivalent to U.S. degrees, and no independent academic credentials evaluation from a reliable service was provided. Without such an evaluation, the record does not establish the required equivalency.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The certifications in the record do not indicate the foreign degrees are equivalent to U.S. degrees, and no independent academic credentials evaluation from a reliable service was provided. Without such an evaluation, the record does not establish the required equivalency.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-12_03_B5203; source_row=27550
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

The AAO reserved its opinion on the second prong because the first prong was dispositive.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
The AAO reserved its opinion on the second prong because the first prong was dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-12_04_B5203; source_row=27555
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer/labor certification

What the decision said

The AAO reserved its opinion on the third prong because the first prong was dispositive.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
The AAO reserved its opinion on the third prong because the first prong was dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-12_04_B5203; source_row=27556
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other13 papers15 citations

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO evaluated the Beneficiary's judging activities, publication and citation record, leading role at the university and within the professional association, and original contributions, and concluded that none of this evidence, individually or collectively, demonstrates sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the small percentage at the very top of the biosafety field at the time of filing.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO evaluated the Beneficiary's judging activities, publication and citation record, leading role at the university and within the professional association, and original contributions, and concluded that none of this evidence, individually or collectively, demonstrates sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the small percentage at the very top of the biosafety field at the time of filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-12_01_B2203; source_row=27544
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other13 papers15 citations

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

What the decision said

The Director found this criterion not met. The Petitioner contested this on appeal, but AAO did not separately re-examine the Step 1 criterion finding, instead incorporating the contributions evidence into the final merits analysis.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
The Director found this criterion not met. The Petitioner contested this on appeal, but AAO did not separately re-examine the Step 1 criterion finding, instead incorporating the contributions evidence into the final merits analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-12_01_B2203; source_row=27541
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

advanced degree qualification

What the decision said

AAO declined to resolve the advanced degree issue itself, finding the Director's omission left the record insufficient for review and warranting remand for the Director to make this determination in the first instance.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to resolve the advanced degree issue itself, finding the Director's omission left the record insufficient for review and warranting remand for the Director to make this determination in the first instance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-12_01_B5203; source_row=27545
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot established

Case facts

Chemistry / Chemical Engineering20 citations

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that recommendation letters did not show implementation or success of the Petitioner's work, citing articles did not differentiate his work from many others cited, citation metrics had methodological problems (self-citations not addressed, non-contemporaneous data, post-filing citations), and peer review activity did not establish stature.…

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that recommendation letters did not show implementation or success of the Petitioner's work, citing articles did not differentiate his work from many others cited, citation metrics had methodological problems (self-citations not addressed, non-contemporaneous data, post-filing citations), and peer review activity did not establish stature. AAO acknowledged the Director's analysis of the future research plans 'was problematic' but found this did not undermine the other bases for revocation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-10_01_B5203; source_row=27535
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment