Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 11631–11640
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherPhD9 citations
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that while the Petitioner had conducted, published, and presented research, he had not shown that his work constitutes a record of success or sufficient progress in advancing MEMS research.…
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the Petitioner had conducted, published, and presented research, he had not shown that his work constitutes a record of success or sufficient progress in advancing MEMS research. Citation evidence was flawed by failure to account for self-citations and post-filing data, support letters lacked specific examples of impact or implementation, and the level of interest generated did not show he was well positioned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-10_02_B5203; source_row=27538 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Chemistry / Chemical Engineering20 citations
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed with the Director, noting that the Petitioner's proposed research has broader implications for the field as results are disseminated through scientific journals and conferences.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director, noting that the Petitioner's proposed research has broader implications for the field as results are disseminated through scientific journals and conferences.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-10_01_B5203; source_row=27534 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherPhD9 citations
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that letters of support, DARPA and Sandia documentation, and evidence of broader commercial and field impact were sufficient to demonstrate both substantial merit and national importance of the Petitioner's proposed MEMS research.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that letters of support, DARPA and Sandia documentation, and evidence of broader commercial and field impact were sufficient to demonstrate both substantial merit and national importance of the Petitioner's proposed MEMS research.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-10_02_B5203; source_row=27537 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The awarding entity's own promotional materials cannot establish outside recognition. The award selection process was internal to the entity, and no evidence of recognition outside the awarding entity was submitted.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The awarding entity's own promotional materials cannot establish outside recognition. The award selection process was internal to the entity, and no evidence of recognition outside the awarding entity was submitted.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-07_01_B2203; source_row=27527 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The business/legal award lacked outside recognition. The law school awards were limited to the highest-scoring student in one class at one school and were not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized. The recommendation letters are not prizes or awards and received no national or international recognition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The business/legal award lacked outside recognition. The law school awards were limited to the highest-scoring student in one class at one school and were not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized. The recommendation letters are not prizes or awards and received no national or international recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-07_01_B2203; source_row=27528 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
Leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's narrow and limited involvement as a legal consultant was not critical to the organizations themselves. His role did not rise to a leading role at the organizational level, and the specific tasks performed, while beneficial, did not establish a critical role as contemplated by the regulation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's narrow and limited involvement as a legal consultant was not critical to the organizations themselves. His role did not rise to a leading role at the organizational level, and the specific tasks performed, while beneficial, did not establish a critical role as contemplated by the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-07_01_B2203; source_row=27531 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Assembly elects one delegate per ten lawyers per law community — meaning 10% of all bar members are delegates — and elections are local, not national. The voting is by the general membership rather than recognized national or international experts. The Assembly is the governing body of the bar, not an independent association requiring outstanding achievements.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Assembly elects one delegate per ten lawyers per law community — meaning 10% of all bar members are delegates — and elections are local, not national. The voting is by the general membership rather than recognized national or international experts. The Assembly is the governing body of the bar, not an independent association requiring outstanding achievements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-07_01_B2203; source_row=27529 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
Published material about the individual in professional or major media
What the decision said
AAO declined to address criterion iii because the Petitioner could not meet the threshold requirement of three criteria even if this criterion were found satisfied, making further analysis unnecessary.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to address criterion iii because the Petitioner could not meet the threshold requirement of three criteria even if this criterion were found satisfied, making further analysis unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-07_01_B2203; source_row=27532 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner failed to establish that any of the submitted publications qualify as professional or major trade publications or other major media. CEO appointment announcements lacked required author credit and were copied or paraphrased from a company press release (not qualifying media). Articles about the company's projects are not 'about' the Petitioner.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner failed to establish that any of the submitted publications qualify as professional or major trade publications or other major media. CEO appointment announcements lacked required author credit and were copied or paraphrased from a company press release (not qualifying media). Articles about the company's projects are not 'about' the Petitioner. The bank executive's letter did not establish expertise in oil and gas trade publications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-06_01_B2203; source_row=27522 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
high remuneration for services in relation to others in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Glassdoor data for 'Natural Power and Energy' referred to a specific company, not the natural energy sector broadly, and the Petitioner did not show that company engaged in similar activity or that its CEO salary was representative of the field. Geographic CEO salary comparisons did not show the surveyed positions were at oil and gas services companies, and the regional sample was too small (17 respondents) to be reliable.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Glassdoor data for 'Natural Power and Energy' referred to a specific company, not the natural energy sector broadly, and the Petitioner did not show that company engaged in similar activity or that its CEO salary was representative of the field. Geographic CEO salary comparisons did not show the surveyed positions were at oil and gas services companies, and the regional sample was too small (17 respondents) to be reliable.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-06_01_B2203; source_row=27526 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c