Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 11641–11650
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot established
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Membership
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The NPA board of trustees is not an association in the field; rather, the NPA provides vocational training and its board is its governing authority. The charter does not show that recognized experts elect board members based on outstanding achievements — instead, stakeholders appoint board members representing them, and the appointment letter shows the decision rested with the Petitioner's employer, not the NPA.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The NPA board of trustees is not an association in the field; rather, the NPA provides vocational training and its board is its governing authority. The charter does not show that recognized experts elect board members based on outstanding achievements — instead, stakeholders appoint board members representing them, and the appointment letter shows the decision rested with the Petitioner's employer, not the NPA.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-06_01_B2203; source_row=27521 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's conference presentations have not been shown to exist in published form disseminated through media as required by the regulation. Additionally, the record does not document the content of his presentations, so it cannot be established that they would qualify as scholarly articles even if published.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's conference presentations have not been shown to exist in published form disseminated through media as required by the regulation. Additionally, the record does not document the content of his presentations, so it cannot be established that they would qualify as scholarly articles even if published.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-06_01_B2203; source_row=27524 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance in the field
What the decision said
The AAO reserved this criterion because even if it were met, the Petitioner would still only satisfy two criteria total (viii and v), which is fewer than the required three, and thus detailed discussion cannot change the outcome of the appeal.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The AAO reserved this criterion because even if it were met, the Petitioner would still only satisfy two criteria total (viii and v), which is fewer than the required three, and thus detailed discussion cannot change the outcome of the appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-06_01_B2203; source_row=27523 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO independently found, based on falsified CD packaging images and contradictory employment claims, that the Petitioner made a false representation, did so willfully (as confirmed by signing Form I-140 under penalty of perjury), and that the misrepresentations were material because they purported to satisfy specific evidentiary criteria.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO independently found, based on falsified CD packaging images and contradictory employment claims, that the Petitioner made a false representation, did so willfully (as confirmed by signing Form I-140 under penalty of perjury), and that the misrepresentations were material because they purported to satisfy specific evidentiary criteria.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-05_02_B2203; source_row=27520 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations with a distinguished reputation
What the decision said
AAO found the Director's three-sentence analysis contained no specific references to evidence and did not address the more than 10 exhibits submitted in the RFE response. AAO remanded for full consideration of all submitted evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's three-sentence analysis contained no specific references to evidence and did not address the more than 10 exhibits submitted in the RFE response. AAO remanded for full consideration of all submitted evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-05_01_B2203; source_row=27517 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other40 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the petitioner in professional or major media
What the decision said
AAO found the Director's conclusion that no evidence of major media appearance existed was not supported by the record, given the Similar Web ranking data showing publications ranked 7th and 8th. AAO also noted that on remand the Director must assess whether articles are truly 'about' the Petitioner as required by regulation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's conclusion that no evidence of major media appearance existed was not supported by the record, given the Similar Web ranking data showing publications ranked 7th and 8th. AAO also noted that on remand the Director must assess whether articles are truly 'about' the Petitioner as required by regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-05_01_B2203; source_row=27514 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
What the decision said
AAO found the Director's analysis was conclusory with no discussion of specific evidence, and the Director's finding that no membership conferral evidence was submitted was contradicted by the record. AAO remanded for re-examination.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's analysis was conclusory with no discussion of specific evidence, and the Director's finding that no membership conferral evidence was submitted was contradicted by the record. AAO remanded for re-examination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-05_01_B2203; source_row=27513 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other40 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration
What the decision said
AAO agreed with the Petitioner that the Director should not have discounted the evidence as coming from an 'unknown source,' noting it was clearly identified as from the Public Ministry website and accompanied by an attorney general's letter. AAO remanded for re-examination.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Petitioner that the Director should not have discounted the evidence as coming from an 'unknown source,' noting it was clearly identified as from the Public Ministry website and accompanied by an attorney general's letter. AAO remanded for re-examination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-05_01_B2203; source_row=27518 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c