Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major media
What the decision said
AAO found the Director failed to address the RFE response letter discussing intended audience and additional documentation, rendering the analysis inadequate. AAO remanded for re-examination.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director failed to address the RFE response letter discussing intended audience and additional documentation, rendering the analysis inadequate. AAO remanded for re-examination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-05_01_B2203; source_row=27516 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
What the decision said
AAO found the Director's analysis was inadequate — it mirrored the RFE despite additional evidence submitted in response, failed to explain specific evidentiary conclusions, and gave little weight to corroborating letters without explanation. AAO remanded for a thorough re-examination.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's analysis was inadequate — it mirrored the RFE despite additional evidence submitted in response, failed to explain specific evidentiary conclusions, and gave little weight to corroborating letters without explanation. AAO remanded for a thorough re-examination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-05_01_B2203; source_row=27512 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The record contained only the 2018 tax return; the 2019 tax return (for the priority date year of April 5, 2019) was absent, leaving the ability-to-pay requirement unestablished from the priority date onward.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record contained only the 2018 tax return; the 2019 tax return (for the priority date year of April 5, 2019) was absent, leaving the ability-to-pay requirement unestablished from the priority date onward.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-04_01_B5203; source_row=27511 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary meets required field of study per labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Beneficiary's diploma shows a doctorate in Information Systems; the labor certification requires Computer Science with no alternates accepted. The evaluations were conclusory and did not compare the two curricula. Professor letters submitted on appeal were not considered because they could have been submitted during the NOID response period.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Beneficiary's diploma shows a doctorate in Information Systems; the labor certification requires Computer Science with no alternates accepted. The evaluations were conclusory and did not compare the two curricula. Professor letters submitted on appeal were not considered because they could have been submitted during the NOID response period.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-04_01_B5203; source_row=27510 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The membership email post-dated the filing date and could not establish eligibility at filing; the lowest membership tier required only 'competence and understanding'; and subjective artistic factors described by the president do not rise to the level of outstanding achievements absent documented bylaws or constitution.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The membership email post-dated the filing date and could not establish eligibility at filing; the lowest membership tier required only 'competence and understanding'; and subjective artistic factors described by the president do not rise to the level of outstanding achievements absent documented bylaws or constitution.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-03_01_B2203; source_row=27505 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
New evidence consisted of correspondence from the awarding entities themselves and unrelated competition rules; recognition of the awarding organization is not the same as recognition of the specific awards, and the Petitioner did not show that honorable mentions attracted the attention expected of widely recognized prizes.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
New evidence consisted of correspondence from the awarding entities themselves and unrelated competition rules; recognition of the awarding organization is not the same as recognition of the specific awards, and the Petitioner did not show that honorable mentions attracted the attention expected of widely recognized prizes.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-03_01_B2203; source_row=27504 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
Listings of asking prices do not show what buyers actually paid; one gallery and one catalog were not shown to be representative of the field; invoices showed only $68,168 in sales over five and a half years with averages around $7,643; and comparison to local minimum wage is not the proper benchmark.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Listings of asking prices do not show what buyers actually paid; one gallery and one catalog were not shown to be representative of the field; invoices showed only $68,168 in sales over five and a half years with averages around $7,643; and comparison to local minimum wage is not the proper benchmark.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-05-03_01_B2203; source_row=27509 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c