Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 11661–11670
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO disagreed with the Director's overly restrictive interpretation that television cannot constitute published material, but still found the criterion unmet because the Petitioner failed to establish the television shows represent a major medium and failed to provide properly certified translations of foreign-language transcripts. The comparable evidence argument also failed.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director's overly restrictive interpretation that television cannot constitute published material, but still found the criterion unmet because the Petitioner failed to establish the television shows represent a major medium and failed to provide properly certified translations of foreign-language transcripts. The comparable evidence argument also failed.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-30_01_B2203; source_row=27497 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the initial evidence threshold was not met, but noted in dicta that the record would not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the initial evidence threshold was not met, but noted in dicta that the record would not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-30_01_B2203; source_row=27503 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim at the top of the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that while the Petitioner showed a growing level of recognition, his awards were not established as prestigious enough to place him among top photographers, the media coverage was limited in demonstrated reach and impact, the judging role was at only a single exhibition not shown to be reserved for top photographers, and the overall evidence showed progression toward the top rather than sustained presence at t…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that while the Petitioner showed a growing level of recognition, his awards were not established as prestigious enough to place him among top photographers, the media coverage was limited in demonstrated reach and impact, the judging role was at only a single exhibition not shown to be reserved for top photographers, and the overall evidence showed progression toward the top rather than sustained presence at the top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-29_03_B2203; source_row=27495 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AI23 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the expert letter addressed the promise and potential of the research but did not demonstrate how the work had already impacted or influenced the field. The promotion letter was based on teaching, scholarship and service rather than recognition for original contributions. Conference presentations and five publications with 23 citations were insufficient without comparative evidence of high citation impact.…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the expert letter addressed the promise and potential of the research but did not demonstrate how the work had already impacted or influenced the field. The promotion letter was based on teaching, scholarship and service rather than recognition for original contributions. Conference presentations and five publications with 23 citations were insufficient without comparative evidence of high citation impact. The Petitioner did not show AAO misapplied law or policy.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-29_02_B2203; source_row=27489 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The new membership evidence all post-dated the August 2018 filing date, and eligibility must be established as of the time of filing. The Petitioner did not contest that her prior IEEE professional membership did not satisfy the criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The new membership evidence all post-dated the August 2018 filing date, and eligibility must be established as of the time of filing. The Petitioner did not contest that her prior IEEE professional membership did not satisfy the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-29_02_B2203; source_row=27487 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why the evidence was persuasive
Both the Director and AAO found this criterion met based on the Petitioner's receipt of multiple awards including PSA Gold Medals and other prizes at photography competitions.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Both the Director and AAO found this criterion met based on the Petitioner's receipt of multiple awards including PSA Gold Medals and other prizes at photography competitions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-29_03_B2203; source_row=27491 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c