Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
What the decision said
AAO finds the Director addressed the wrong evidence (sheet music for arrangement work the Petitioner did not claim) rather than evidence of live performances. AAO remands for proper evaluation of the live performance evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO finds the Director addressed the wrong evidence (sheet music for arrangement work the Petitioner did not claim) rather than evidence of live performances. AAO remands for proper evaluation of the live performance evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-16_01_B2203; source_row=27378 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations with a distinguished reputation
What the decision said
AAO finds the Director failed to reach any conclusion as to the Petitioner's role with the third ensemble he founded. AAO remands for evaluation of the evidence regarding that role and the group's reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO finds the Director failed to reach any conclusion as to the Petitioner's role with the third ensemble he founded. AAO remands for evaluation of the evidence regarding that role and the group's reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-16_01_B2203; source_row=27379 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWprocedural or otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
procedural or other
motion to reopen requirements
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the motion to reopen was properly dismissed because most documents were copies of previously submitted materials and the new exhibits were general background information rather than facts specific to the petition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the motion to reopen was properly dismissed because most documents were copies of previously submitted materials and the new exhibits were general background information rather than facts specific to the petition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-16_01_B5203; source_row=27380 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO stated it need not conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet three criteria, but reviewed the record in the aggregate and found it insufficient to establish sustained acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO stated it need not conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet three criteria, but reviewed the record in the aggregate and found it insufficient to establish sustained acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-16_02_B2203; source_row=27391 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
high salary or significantly high remuneration relative to others in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the Director's conclusion, finding the DOL OWL data insufficient to establish that the Beneficiary's salary was high relative to others, as the mean wage alone does not provide a complete picture of the range of executive salaries.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's conclusion, finding the DOL OWL data insufficient to establish that the Beneficiary's salary was high relative to others, as the mean wage alone does not provide a complete picture of the range of executive salaries.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-15_02_B2203; source_row=27345 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that the awards were given to products and companies, not to the Beneficiary personally, and that the awards were based on product performance rather than the business acumen of those who developed or marketed them.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the awards were given to products and companies, not to the Beneficiary personally, and that the awards were based on product performance rather than the business acumen of those who developed or marketed them.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-15_02_B2203; source_row=27341 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
Petitioner's claimed contributions — being an early female hire, creating a documentary, and receiving employer praise — were not shown to be original contributions of major significance. Letters provided only general praise without identifying specific original contributions or explaining their significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Petitioner's claimed contributions — being an early female hire, creating a documentary, and receiving employer praise — were not shown to be original contributions of major significance. Letters provided only general praise without identifying specific original contributions or explaining their significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-15_01_B2203; source_row=27331 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments
Why AAO was not persuaded
Although the organizations employing the Petitioner had distinguished reputations, the evidence did not establish that the Petitioner performed in a leading or critical role. Media coverage of her hiring described her as joining a team of three other reporters, and no objective data supported the claim that she was responsible for ratings performance.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Although the organizations employing the Petitioner had distinguished reputations, the evidence did not establish that the Petitioner performed in a leading or critical role. Media coverage of her hiring described her as joining a team of three other reporters, and no objective data supported the claim that she was responsible for ratings performance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-15_01_B2203; source_row=27334 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Television appearances as a sports journalist do not constitute display at artistic exhibitions or showcases. The purpose of sports journalism is to inform viewers, not to provide an artistic exhibition, and the criterion does not broadly apply to every field that touches on the word 'art'.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Television appearances as a sports journalist do not constitute display at artistic exhibitions or showcases. The purpose of sports journalism is to inform viewers, not to provide an artistic exhibition, and the criterion does not broadly apply to every field that touches on the word 'art'.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-15_01_B2203; source_row=27333 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c